The central question
Church tradition has the apostle John as the author of the Gospel according to John, and the three letters of John (1 John, 2 John, 3 John).
By “the apostle John” I mean John, son of Zebedee, brother of James, one of the twelve named apostles in the Gospels. At the beginning of e.g. Mark (Mark 1:16-20), he is a fisherman, working in a business with his brother and father:
Now walking beside the sea of Galilee, he saw Simon and Andrew his brother, sons of Simon, casting a net in the sea; for they were fishermen. And Jesus said to them, Come-here after me and I will make you to become fishermen of men. And immediately they left their nets and followed him. And he advanced a few feet from there and saw James and John his brother, the sons of Zebedee, and they were in the ship mending the nets. And immediately he called them, and they left their father Zebedee with the hired-hands in the ship and went after him. (Modern Literal Version - MLV)1
For reasons that will soon become clear, I will call this person “John son of Zebedee” or JsZ for short.
For the moment, I’ll assume that there is a single author of John’s Gospel and at least 1 John. I think that’s a reasonable assumption. Let’s say we don’t know who that author is. So we’ll call this person the “Author of John’s Gospel” or AJG for short.
For reasons I won’t go into in detail here, but most famously described in Dodd (1963), there is internal evidence that AJG knew geographical and historical details of first-century Palestine and Jerusalem and Judaism, that make it tempting to assume that AJG was an eye-witness. JsZ would have been such an eye-witness. But was he the author of John?
The Gospel itself indicates that it was written by “the beloved disciple”. From John 21:21-22,24:
But Peter turned again and sees the disciple whom Jesus loved following; who also leaned-back upon his chest at the supper and who had said, Lord, who is he who is giving you up? … This is the disciple who is testifying concerning these things and wrote these things and we know that his testimony is true.
For various reasons, it seems likely that we are to understand it was this disciple who was the “other disciple” that went with Peter to the house of the High Priest while Jesus was being tried (John 18:15-16):
Now Simon Peter was following Jesus and the other disciple. Now that disciple was known to the high-priest and entered in together-with Jesus into the courtyard of the high-priest; but Peter stood outside before the door. Therefore, the other disciple, who was known to the high-priest, went forth and spoke to the doorkeeper and led in Peter. (MLV)
It’s possible, but hard, to see how a fisherman, even someone who worked in a business with hired hands, would have been “known to the high-priest”.
One response to this and other difficulties, is to suggest that John, the beloved disciple, was a disciple named John, other than JsZ. Martin Hengel made this proposal in Hengel (1989), followed by Bauckham (1993) and others.
However, there is a hard test for this hypothesis, in the form of Irenaeus of Lyons. He wrote several works in the late second century, listed below, that cite John and refer to the authorship of the Gospel and letters. He would have had good reason to know who had written the Gospel and letters, because he had been a disciple of Polycarp (c69 AD - c155 AD), who had in turn been taught by a John who had seen Jesus. Irenaeus writes, in his letter to Florinus (see below):
I can even describe the place where the blessed Polycarp used to sit and discourse — his going out, too, and his coming in — his general mode of life and personal appearance, together with the discourses which he delivered to the people; also how he would speak of his familiar intercourse with John, and with the rest of those who had seen the Lord; and how he would call their words to remembrance.
As we will see, it must be this John that Irenaeus believes to be AJG.
So, there is a strong eye-witness tradition linking AJG to Irenaeus, through Polycarp, and perhaps through Pothinus, Irenaeus’ predecessor as Bishop of Lyons, who may also have been a disciple of Polycarp.
The test for the Hengel / Bauckham hypothesis, is whether Irenaeus’ substantial extant writings can reasonably be read on the understanding that Irenaeus knew that AJG was not JsZ, but another disciple of Jesus, also called John.
That is the theme for the rest of the page, starting with some discussion and summary, and ending with all evidence I could bring to bear from Irenaeus’ writing.
To leap to the end, it seems to me that Irenaeus’ writing is compatible with AJG as JsZ, or with AJG being another of Jesus’ disciples, also called John. It’s striking that AJG in Irenaeus is very specifically and often called “the disciple of the Lord”, which seems to have been a familiar title of AJG, and no other disciple. This is suggestive of “the disciple whom Jesus loved” of the Gospel text.
See “Summary of results” below for more detail.
Irenaeus and his texts
Irenaeus’ life and writing are summarized in:
His known works are: (see Britannica):
- Against heresies (AH)
- Demonstration of the Apostolic Preaching (DAP)
- Various fragments.
Eusebius of Caesarea quotes from, and refers to Irenaeus’ work in his Ecclesiastical History (EH) — 316-326 AD (also see J. B. Lightfoot’s biography of Eusebius).
Use of John and “apostle” in Irenaeus’ writing
Most of the quotes here are from Irenaeus’ five books of Against Heresies — abbreviated AH, but I also cover Irenaeus’ other known work, as you’ll see below.
The quotes below record all mentions of “John” and “apostle” in Irenaeus, to document who Irenaeus thinks John is, and how Irenaeus uses the term “apostle”, and whether, and in what sense, Irenaeus considered John to be an apostle.
Sources
Roberts and Donaldson (1885a) has the full text in English translation. Harvey (1857) is an edition of the Latin text that is our main source for AH. I refer to the AH text below by book number, chapter number (in Roman numerals), section number, and Roberts page number — e.g AH 4, XXXV:2 p513. The Bibliothek der Kirchenväter site (BKV) has Roberts’ text as clean web pages, to which I link below.
As a side-note, we aren’t likely to have any difficulty using the English translation for “apostle”, as Greek αποστολος is Latin apostolus.
Summary of results
John the disciple of the Lord
When referring to John the author, Irenaeus very often uses the set phrase “John, the disciple of the Lord” (14 times of 49 total uses of “John” other than John the Baptist). There are two places where he indicates John by “disciple of the lord”, or “His disciple”, without naming him, although John is clear from the context: AH 3, XI:3, AH 3, XVI:8. He does not use the phrase “disciple of the Lord” of any other person, though he several times refers in general to the “disciples of the Lord” or “His disciples” in AH 2, II:5; AH 3, XII:4-5 (twice); AH 3, XII:13; AH 3, XVI:5; AH 5, XXXIV:3.
So “disciple of [the,our] Lord”, or “the Lord’s disciple” in Irenaeus always means John the author of the Gospel or the letters, or the Apocalypse.
This is similar to the phrasing of Papias, quoted by Eusebius in Eusebius of Caesarea (1890) (EH III. 39, p289). From Lightfoot and Harmer (1891), p529, (quoting Eusebius, quoting Papias):
And again, any occasion when a person came (in my way) who had been a follower of the Elders, I would inquire about the discourses of the elders — what was said by Andrew, or by Peter, or by Philip, or by Thomas or James, or by John or Matthew or any other of the Lord’s disciples, and what Aristion and the Elder John, the disciples of the Lord, say.
John’s Gospel gives its own primary author as “the beloved disciple” (John 21:24), who is not otherwise explicitly named or identified.
The author of the second and third letters of John introduces himself only as “The elder” (2 John 1:1, 3 John 1:1).
Revelation (the Apocalypse) names its source as “[Jesus Christ’s] servant John” (Revelation 1:1)
Irenaeus’ apostles
Irenaeus only ever uses “the Apostle N” or “N the Apostle” for: Paul (17 times); Matthew (once of 17 mentions of “Matthew”) and Peter (once for 48 mentions of “Peter”). He never uses “the Apostle John” or “John the Apostle”.
For Irenaeus, the most representative apostles are Peter and Paul — he criticizes the heretics for claiming to be “superior to his disciples, such as Peter and Paul, and the rest of the apostles” (AH 1, XXV:2, p350), and contrasts the heretics’ teaching with that of the apostles with “Therefore let them not any longer assert that Peter and Paul and the other apostles proclaimed the truth …” AH 4, XXXV:2 p513
In his letters, Paul specifically and often identifies himself as an “apostle of Christ Jesus” (e.g. Romans 1:1, 1 and 2 Corinthians 1), but did not claim to have met Jesus in person.
When referring to apostles, Irenaeus sometimes means:
- The 12 named apostles; I’ve labeled these references as “12” below.
- Paul
- The source of definitive teaching from and about Jesus. I’ve labeled these references as “SA”.
The question at hand is whether Irenaeus, when citing the apostles as general authority (SA), restricted the apostles to the 12 plus Paul.
As background, it is clear from the quotes below that:
- Irenaeus identifies the author of John’s Gospel as John, the disciple of the Lord: “… John, the disciple of the Lord, who also had leaned upon His breast, did himself publish a Gospel during his residence at Ephesus in Asia.” AH 3, I:1 p414 (see below). Also: “And to these things does John also, the disciple of the Lord, bear witness, when he speaks thus in the Gospel: “In the beginning was the Word, and the Word was with God, and the Word was God. …” AH XVIII:2 p546.
- The same John, disciple of the Lord, is the author of the Apocalypse: “And. if any one will devote a close attention to those things … which John the disciple of the Lord saw in the Apocalypse,” … AH 4, XXX:4 p504.
- The same John is the author of letters 1 John and 2 John. AH 1, XVI:3 has “John, the disciple of the Lord … says …” followed by a quote from 2 John. In AH 3, XVI:8: “His disciple, in his Epistle already mentioned,” (quoting 2 John), and later: “Wherefore he again exclaims in his Epistle,” (quoting 1 John).
- Irenaeus considered John the disciple of the Lord to be an apostle: “[the heretics assert that John] has, by thus speaking, referred to the primary Ogdoad, in which there was as yet no Jesus, and no Christ, the teacher of John. But that the apostle did not speak concerning their conjunctions, but concerning our Lord Jesus Christ, whom he also acknowledges as the Word of God, he himself has made evident. For, summing up his statements respecting the Word previously mentioned by him, he further declares,”And the Word was made flesh, and dwelt among us.” AH 1, IX:2-3 p329 (see below).
The question though, is whether Irenaeus is asserting that John — the disciple of the Lord — was also one of the 12. Could he, instead, have been referring to some other John, who was an apostle in the sense of being one of Jesus’ disciples, and therefore, a source of reliable testimony?
Irenaeus does use this second, more general interpretation of apostle, when he argues that John the Baptist could be considered an apostle, because “he actually saw [[Jesus]] when he came, and pointed him out”:
Wherefore the Lord said that He deemed [[John the Baptist]] “more than a prophet.” For all the other prophets preached the advent of the paternal Light, and desired to be worthy of seeing Him whom they preached; but John did both announce [the advent] beforehand, in a like manner as did the others, and actually saw Him when He came, and pointed Him out, and persuaded many to believe on Him, so that he did himself hold the place of both prophet and apostle. For this is to be more than a prophet, because, “first apostles, secondarily prophets;” … AH 3, XI:4 p427. (see below)
There is another piece of suggestive evidence that Irenaeus allows other disciples of Jesus to be apostles. He writes: “For that Judas the traitor is the twelfth in order, is agreed upon by all, there being twelve apostles mentioned by name in the Gospel.” AH 2, XX:4 p388; “mentioned by name” weakly implies there may be other apostles not mentioned by name.
Use of “apostle” in early church writing
What did other early church writers mean by the term “apostle”?
First note that Acts 14:14 (MLV) describes Barnabas as an apostle:
But after the apostles, Barnabas and Paul, heard it, they ripped their garments and dashed into the crowd, …”
Barnabas was of course not one of the 12, but was a member of the early church. He may have been an eyewitness to at least some of Jesus’ life and teaching. We first see him in Acts 4:36-37 (MLV):
Now Joses, who was surnamed Barnabas from the apostles (which is, being translated, Son of Encouragement), a Levite from Cyprus by birth, sold a field, possessed by him, and brought the money and placed it beside the apostles’ feet.
See the Lampe (1961) lexicon entry for αποστολος (emissary, apostle) (pp. 211 - 214). It lists five broad categories, of which I is “in gen”, II is “of Christ as sent forth from the Father”, and III is “of one sent by God or Christ to preach and act on his behalf;”. Sub-meaning B of III is “of NT apostles, comprising 1. The Twelve, … 2. other leaders of primitive Church …”, with various entries therein.
From Lampe we see that Clement of Alexandria, writing soon after AH, refers to Clement of Rome (died around 100) as “the apostle Clement” (Stromata 4, XVII:105) (Roberts and Donaldson 1885b, 2:428).
In the early fourth century, Eusebius’ Ecclesiastical History (EH), shows a wide view of the term “apostle”. From Eusebius of Caesarea (1890):
Afterwards he says he appeared unto James, who was one of the so-called brethren of the Savior. But, since in addition to these, there were many others who were called apostles, in imitation of the Twelve, as was Paul himself, he adds: “Afterward he appeared to all the apostles.” [[1 Corinthians 15:7]] EH 1, XII:4 Another version at BKV
Abbreviations and notation
- AH - Irenaeus’ Against Heresies.
- EH - Eusebius’ Ecclesiastical History.
- AJG - Author of John’s Gospel.
- JsZ - John son of Zebedee, one of the 12 Apostles.
- SA - Source of Authority. It is not clear who specifically is being referred to (other than those named explicitly).
- BKV — Bibliothek der Kirchenväter
For each quote referring to “apostle”, I have tried to classify the meaning into one of more of “12” (the 12 apostles specifically), “12 + Paul”, “AJG”, “JsZ” or “SA”, allowing that “SA” might also be “12”. I have labeled quotes referring to “John” specifically in the heading. If there is no such label, then the quote refers to “apostle”.
Quotes and page numbers below are from Roberts and Donaldson (1885a). Text in quotes enclosed in double square brackets ([[like this]]) is my own explanation, and is not in Roberts (Roberts and Donaldson (1885a)). Text enclosed in single square brackets ([like this]) comes from Roberts. Roberts sometimes uses parentheses — like (this) — for explanation or insertion; I haven’t changed this.
Use of “John” and “apostle” in Against Heresies
AH 1, Preface:1
Inasmuch as certain men have set the truth aside, and bring in lying words and vain genealogies, which,” as the apostle says,” minister questions rather than godly edifying which is in faith,” [[quoting 1 Tim 1:4]] 1, Preface:1 p315 BKV (Paul)
AH 1, III:2
2/ The production, again, of the Duodecad of the Aeons, is indicated by the fact that the Lord was twelve years of age when He disputed with the teachers of the law, and by the election of the apostles, for of these there were twelve. [[Luke vi 13]], AH 1,III:2 p319 BKV (12 Apostles)
AH 1, III:3
3/ They further maintain that the passion which took place in the case of the twelfth Aeon is pointed at by the apostasy of Judas, who was the twelfth apostle, and also by the fact that Christ suffered in the twelfth month. AH 1, III:3 p319 BKV (12)
AH 1, III:5 (John, apostle)
They [[the heretics]] also maintain that John indicated the same thing [[the twofold Houros / Stauros nature of God]] when he said, “The fan is in His hand, and He will thoroughly purge the floor, and will gather the wheat into His garner; but the chaff He will burn with fire unquenchable.” [[Luke 3:17]] By this declaration He set forth the faculty of Horos. For that fan they explain to be the cross (Stauros), which consumes, no doubt, all material objects, as fire does chaff, but it purifies all them that are saved, as a fan does wheat. Moreover, they affirm that the Apostle Paul himself made mention of this cross in the following words … AH 1, III:5, p320 BKV (Paul)
AH 1, III:6
6/ Such, then, is the account which they all give of their Pleroma, and of the formation of the universe, striving, as they do, to adapt the good words of revelation to their own wicked inventions. And it is not only from the writings of the evangelists and the apostles that they endeavour to derive proofs for their opinions by means of perverse interpretations and deceitful expositions: they deal in the same way with the law and the prophets, which contain many parables and allegories that can frequently be drawn into various senses, according to the kind of exegesis to which they are subjected. AH 1, III:6 p320 BKV (likely thinking of evangelists as Mark, Luke, and apostles as Matthew, John-AJG, Paul and Peter)
AH 1, VIII:1
1/ Such, then, is their system, which neither the prophets announced, nor the Lord taught, nor the apostles delivered, but of which they boast that beyond all others they have a perfect knowledge. They gather their views from other sources than the Scriptures; and, to use a common proverb, they strive to weave ropes of sand, while they endeavour to adapt with an air of probability to their own peculiar assertions the parables of the Lord, the sayings of the prophets, and the words of the apostles, in order that their scheme may not seem altogether without support. AH 1, VIII:1 p326 BKV (SA)
AH 1, VIII:4 (John reference)
Further, they teach that John, the disciple of the Lord, indicated the first Ogdoad, expressing themselves in these words: John, the disciple of the Lord, wishing to set forth the origin of all things, so as to explain how the Father produced the whole, … expresses himself thus: “In the beginning was the Word, and the Word was with God, and the Word was God;…” [[John 1:1]] AH 1, VIII:4 p328, continued intermittently through paragraph 5, p329 BKV
AH 1, IX:2-3
For if he has named the Father, and Charis, and Monogenes, and Aletheia, and Logos, and Zoe, and Anthropos, and Ecclesia, according to their hypothesis, he has, by thus speaking, referred to the primary Ogdoad, in which there was as yet no Jesus, and no Christ, the teacher of John. But that the apostle did not speak concerning their conjunctions, but concerning our Lord Jesus Christ, whom he also acknowledges as the Word of God, he himself has made evident. For, summing up his statements respecting the Word previously mentioned by him, he further declares, “And the Word was made flesh, and dwelt among us.” But, according to their hypothesis, the Word did not become flesh at all, inasmuch as He never went outside of the Pleroma, but that Saviour [became flesh] who was formed by a special dispensation [out of all the Aeons], and was of later date than the Word.
3/ Learn then, ye foolish men, that Jesus who suffered for us, and who dwelt among us, is Himself the Word of God. For if any other of the Aeons had become flesh for our salvation, it would have been probable that the apostle spoke of another. But if the Word of the Father who descended is the same also that ascended, He, namely, the Only-begotten Son of the only God, who, according to the good pleasure of the Father, became flesh for the sake of men, the apostle certainly does not speak regarding any other, or concerning any Ogdoad, but respecting our Lord Jesus Christ. AH 1, IX:2-3 p329 BKV(AJG)
AH 1, X:1
1/ The Church, though dispersed throughout, the whole world, even to the ends of the earth, has received from the apostles and their disciples this faith: [She believes] in one God, the Father Almighty, Maker of heaven, and earth, and the sea, and all things that are in them; … AH 1, X:1 p330 BKV (SA)
AH 1, X:3
For in reference to these points, and others of a like nature, the apostle exclaims: “Oh! the depth of the riches both of the wisdom and knowledge of God; how unsearchable are His judgments, and His ways past finding out!” [Romans XI:33] AH 1, X:3 p331 BKV (Paul)
AH 1, XIII:6
They proclaim themselves as being “perfect,” so that no-one can be compared to them with respect to the immensity of their knowledge, nor even were you to mention Paul or Peter, or any other of the apostles. AH 1, XIII:6 p335 BKV (SA).
AH 1, XVI:3 (John reference)
And John, the disciple of the Lord, has intensified their condemnation, when he desires us not even to address to them the salutation of “good-speed;” for, says he, “He that bids them be of good-speed is a partaker with their evil deeds;” [[2 John 1:10-11]] and that with reason, “for there is no good-speed to the ungodly,” saith the Lord. AH 1, XVI:3 p341 BKV
AH 1, XVIII:3
Jeroboam also, who received the ten sceptres (tribes), and the ten courts of the tabernacle, and the columns of ten cubits [high] , and the ten sons of Jacob who were at first sent into Egypt to buy corn, and the ten apostles to whom the Lord appeared after His resurrection, — Thomas being absent, — represented, according to them, the invisible Decad. AH 1, XVIII:3 p344 BKV (12)
AH 1, XVIII:4
… the number, too, of the apostles; and, in fine, every event which embraces in it the number twelve, — set forth their Duodecad. AH 1, XVIII:4 p344 BKV (12)
AH 1, XXIII:1
1/ Simon the Samaritan was that magician of whom Luke, the disciple and follower of the apostles, says, “But there was a certain man, Simon by name, who beforetime used magical arts in that city, and led astray the people of Samaria, declaring that he himself was some great one, to whom they all gave heed, from the least to the greatest, saying, This is the power of God, which is called great. And to him they had regard, because that of long time he had driven them mad by his sorceries.” This Simon, then — who feigned faith, supposing that the apostles themselves performed their cures by the art of magic, and not by the power of God; and with respect to their filling with the Holy Ghost, through the imposition of hands, those that believed in God through Him who was preached by them, namely, Christ Jesus — suspecting that even this was done through a kind of greater knowledge of magic, and offering money to the apostles, thought he, too, might receive this power of bestowing the Holy Spirit on whomsoever he would, — was addressed in these words by Peter: “Thy money perish with thee, because thou hast thought that the gift of God can be purchased with money: thou hast neither part nor lot in this matter, for thy heart is not right in the sight of God; for I perceive that thou art in the gall of bitterness, and in the bond of iniquity.” He, then, not putting faith in God a whit the more, set himself eagerly to contend against the apostles, in order that he himself might seem to be a wonderful being, and applied himself with still greater zeal to the study of the whole magic art, that he might the better bewilder and overpower multitudes of men. AH 1, XXIII:1 p347 BKV [[Acts 89-24]] (Peter and JsZ).
AH 1, XXV:2
This idea has raised them to such a pitch of pride, that some of them declare themselves similar to Jesus; while others, still more mighty, maintain that they are superior to his disciples, such as Peter and Paul, and the rest of the apostles, whom they consider to be in no respect inferior to Jesus. AH 1, XXV:2, p350 BKV (SA)
AH 1, XXV:5
And in their writings we read as follows, the interpretation which they give [of their views], declaring that Jesus spoke in a mystery to His disciples and apostles privately, and that they requested and obtained permission to hand down the things thus taught them, to others who should be worthy and believing. AH 1, XXV:5, p351 BKV (12)
AH 1, XXVI:2
They use the Gospel according to Matthew only, and repudiate the Apostle Paul, maintaining that he was an apostate from the law. AH 1, XXVI:2, p352 BKV (Paul)
AH 1, XXVI:3
3/ The Nicolaitanes are the followers of that Nicolas who was one of the seven first ordained to the diaconate by the apostles. AH 1, XXVI:3, p352 BKV (?12)
AH 1, XXVI:3 (John reference)
The character of these men is very plainly pointed out in the Apocalypse of John, … AH 1, XXVI:3 p352 BKV
AH 1, XXVII:1
1/ Cerdo was one who took his system from the followers of Simon, and came to live at Rome in the time of Hyginus, who held the ninth place in the episcopal succession from the apostles downwards. AH 1, XXVII:1 p352 BKV (SA)
AH 1, XXVII:2
He [[Marcion]] likewise persuaded his disciples that he himself was more worthy of credit than are those apostles who have handed down the Gospel to us, furnishing them not with the Gospel, but merely a fragment of it. In like manner, too, he dismembered the Epistles of Paul, removing all that is said by the apostle respecting that God who made the world, to the effect that He is the Father of our Lord Jesus Christ, and also those passages from the prophetical writings which the apostle quotes, in order to teach us that they announced beforehand the coming of the Lord. AH 1, XXVII:2 p352 BKV (SA, Paul)
AH 1, XXVII:4
4/ But since this man is the only one who has dared openly to mutilate the Scriptures, and unblushingly above all others to inveigh against God, I purpose specially to refute him, convicting him out of his own writings ; and, with the help of God, I shall overthrow him out of those discourses of the Lord and the apostles, which are of authority with him, and of which he makes use. AH 1, XXVII:4 p352-3 BKV (SA)
AH 2, II:5
Now, that this God [[of John 1]] is the Father of our Lord Jesus Christ, Paul the apostle also has declared, [saying,] “There is one God, the Father, who is above all, and through all things, and in us all.” I have indeed proved already that there is only one God; but I shall further demonstrate this from the apostles themselves, and from the discourses of the Lord. For what sort of conduct would it be, were we to forsake the utterances of the prophets, of the Lord, and of the apostles, that we might give heed to these persons, who speak not a word of sense? AH 2, II:5 p362 BKV (Paul + SA)
AH 2, II:5 (John reference)
His own Word is both suitable and sufficient for the formation of all things, even as John, the disciple of the Lord, declares regarding Him: “All things were made by Him, and without Him was nothing made.” Now, among the “all things” our world must be embraced. It too, therefore, was made by His Word, as Scripture tells us in the book of Genesis that He made all things connected with our world by His Word. David also expresses the same truth [when he says], “For He spake, and they were made; He commanded, and they were created.” Whom, therefore, shall we believe as to the creation of the world — these heretics who have been mentioned that prate so foolishly and inconsistently on the subject, or the disciples of the Lord, and Moses, who was both a faithful servant of God and a prophet? He at first narrated the formation of the world in these words: “In the beginning God created the heaven and the earth,” and all other things in succession; but neither gods nor angels [had any share in the work]. AH 2, II:5, p361-2 BKV
AH 2, IX:1
The Universal Church, moreover, through the whole world, has received this tradition [[that God created the world]] from the apostles. AH 2, IX:1 p369 BKV (SA)
AH 2, XII:8
Let them, then, henceforth seek to set forth some other reasons why the Lord came to be baptized at the age of thirty years, and [explain in some other way] the Duodecad of the apostles; AH 2, XII:8 p373 BKV (12)
AH 2, XX:1
They endeavour, for instance, to demonstrate that passion which, they say, happened in the case of the twelfth Aeon, from this fact, that the passion of the Saviour was brought about by the twelfth apostle, and happened in the twelfth month. AH 2, XX:1 p387 BKV (12)
AH 2, XX:4
For that Judas the traitor is the twelfth in order, is agreed upon by all, there being twelve apostles mentioned by name in the Gospel. AH 2, XX:4 p388 BKV (12)
AH 2, XXI:1-2
1/ If, again, they maintain that the twelve apostles were a type only of that group of twelve Aeons which Anthropos in conjunction with Ecclesia produced, then let them produce ten other apostles as a type of those ten remaining Aeons, who, as they declare, were produced by Logos and Zoe. … [[an extended discussion of the number 12 with relation to the number of apostles]]
2/ … Moreover, we must not keep silence respecting Paul, but demand from them after the type of what Aeon that apostle has been handed down to us …” AH 2, XXI:1-2, p389 BKV (12, Paul)
AH 2, XXII:2
And the time thus referred to is not called “a year” only, but is also named “a day” both by the prophet and by Paul, of whom the apostle, calling to mind the Scripture, says in the Epistle addressed to the Romans, “As it is written, for thy sake we are killed all the day long, as we are counted as sheep to the slaughter.” AH 2, XXII:2 p390 BKV (Paul)
AH 2, XXII:3 (John reference)
… He [[Jesus]] went up to the festival day of the passover, on which occasion it is written, “For many believed in Him, when they saw the signs which He did,” [[John 2:23]] as John the disciple of the Lord records. AH 2, XXII, 3: p390-391 BKV
AH 2, XXII:5 (John, apostle reference)
And how could He have taught, unless He had reached the age of a Master? For when He came to be baptized, He had not yet completed His thirtieth year, but was beginning to be about thirty years of age (for thus Luke, who has mentioned His years, has expressed it: “Now Jesus was, as it were, beginning to be thirty years old,” [[Luke 3:23]] when He came to receive baptism); and, [according to these men,] He preached only one year reckoning from His baptism. On completing His thirtieth year He suffered, being in fact still a young man, and who had by no means attained to advanced age. Now, that the first stage of early life embraces thirty years, and that this extends onwards to the fortieth year, every one will admit; but from the fortieth and fiftieth year a man begins to decline towards old age, which our Lord possessed while He still fulfilled the office of a Teacher, even as the Gospel and all the elders testify; those who were conversant in Asia with John, the disciple of the Lord, [affirming] that John conveyed to them that information. And he remained among them up to the times of Trajan. Some of them, moreover, saw not only John, but the other apostles also, and heard the very same account from them, and bear testimony as to the [validity of] the statement. Whom then should we rather believe? Whether such men as these, or Ptolemaeus, who never saw the apostles, and who never even in his dreams attained to the slightest trace of an apostle? AH 2, XXII:5 p392 BKV (AJG? JsZ? SA)
AH 2, XXIV:4 (John reference)
Again, five men are said to have been with the Lord when He obtained testimony from the Father, — namely, Peter, and James, and John, and Moses, and Elias. AH 2, XXIV:4 p395 BKV
AH 2, XXV:1
1/ If any one, however, say in reply to these things, What then? Is it a meaningless and accidental thing, that the positions of names, and the election of the apostles, and the working of the Lord, and the arrangement of created things, are what they are? — we answer them: Certainly not; … Nor should they seek to prosecute inquiries respecting God by means of numbers, syllables, and letters. For this is an uncertain mode of proceeding, on account of their varied and diverse systems, and because every sort of hypothesis may at the present day be, in like manner, devised by any one; AH 2, XXV:1 p396 BKV (12)
AH 2, XXVIII:3
As the apostle has said on this point, that, when other things have been done away, then these three, “faith, hope and charity, shall endure.” AH 2, XXVIII:3 p399 BKV (Paul)
AH 2, XXVIII:7
And that God fore-knew that this would happen, the Scriptures do in like manner demonstrate, since He prepared eternal fire from the beginning for those who were [afterwards] to transgress [His commandments]; but the cause itself of the nature of such transgressors neither has any Scripture informed us, nor has an apostle told us, nor has the Lord taught us. AH 2, XXVIII:7 p401 BKV (SA)
AH 2, XXVIII:9
9/ But if any lover of strife contradict what I have said, and also what the apostle affirms, that “we know in part, and prophesy in part,” AH 2, XXVIII:9 p402 BKV (Paul)
AH 2, XXX:7-9
7/ … Paul expressly testifies that there are spiritual things when he declares that he was caught up into the third heaven, … But since he (Paul) has described that assumption of himself up to the third heaven as something great and pre-eminent, it cannot be that these men ascend above the seventh heaven, for they are certainly not superior to the apostle. … but it is therefore thus far permitted even without the body to behold spiritual mysteries which are the operations of God, who made the heavens and the earth, and formed man, and placed him in paradise, so that those should be spectators of them who, like the apostle, have reached a high degree of perfection in the love of God.
8/ This Being, therefore, also made spiritual things, of which, as far as to the third heaven, the apostle was made a spectator, … AH 2, XXX:7-9 p405 BKV (Paul)
AH 2, XXX:9
He is the God of Abraham, … whom Christ reveals, whom the apostles make known to us, and in whom the Church believes. AH 2, XXX:9 p406 BKV (SA)
AH 2, XXXI:2
And so far are they from being able to raise the dead, as the Lord raised them, and the apostles did by means of prayer, and as has been frequently done in the brotherhood on account of some necessity — … AH 2, XXXI:2 p407 BKV (SA)
AH 2, XXXV:4
4/ Now, that the preaching of the apostles, the authoritative teaching of the Lord, the announcements of the prophets, the dictated utterances of the apostles,[ [footnote 3]] …
[[Contents of footnote 3]] The words are “apostolorum dictatio,” probably referring to the letters of the apostles, as distinguished from their preaching already mentioned. AH 2 XXXV:4 p413 BKV (SA)
AH 3, Preface
… the only true and life-giving faith, which the Church has received from the apostles and imparted to her sons. For the Lord of all gave to His apostles the power of the Gospel, through whom also we have known the truth, … AH 3, Preface p414 BKV (SA).
AH 3, I:1
1/ We have learned from none others the plan of our salvation, than from those through whom the Gospel has come down to us, which they did at one time proclaim in public, and, at a later period, by the will of God, handed down to us in the Scriptures, to be the ground and pillar of our faith. For it is unlawful to assert that they preached before they possessed “perfect knowledge,” as some do even venture to say, boasting themselves as improvers of the apostles. For, after our Lord rose from the dead, [the apostles] were invested with power from on high when the Holy Spirit came down [upon them], were filled from all [His gifts], and had perfect knowledge; they departed to the ends of the earth, preaching the glad tidings of the good things [sent] from God to us, and proclaiming the peace of heaven to men, who indeed do all equally and individually possess the Gospel of God. Matthew also issued a written Gospel among the Hebrews in their own dialect, while Peter and Paul were preaching at Rome, and laying the foundations of the Church. After their departure, Mark, the disciple and interpreter of Peter, did also hand down to us in writing what had been preached by Peter. Luke also, the companion of Paul, recorded in a book the Gospel preached by him. Afterwards, John, the disciple of the Lord, who also had leaned upon His breast, did himself publish a Gospel during his residence at Ephesus in Asia. … AH 3, I:1 p414 BKV (Acts 2 isn’t clear on who received the holy spirit at Pentecost, although the 12 is implied)
AH 3, II:2
2/ But, again, when we refer them to that tradition which originates from the apostles, [and] which is preserved by means of the successions of presbyters in the Churches, they object to tradition, saying that they themselves are wiser not merely than the presbyters, but even than the apostles, because they have discovered the unadulterated truth. For [they maintain] that the apostles intermingled the things of the law with the words of the Saviour; and that not the apostles alone, but even the Lord Himself, spoke as at one time from the Demiurge, at another from the intermediate place, and yet again from the Pleroma, but that they themselves, indubitably, unsulliedly, and purely, have knowledge of the hidden mystery: … AH 3, II:2 p416 BKV (SA)
AH 3, III:1
1/ It is within the power of all, therefore, in every Church, who may wish to see the truth,, to contemplate clearly the tradition of the apostles manifested throughout the whole world; and we are in a position to reckon up those who were by the apostles instituted bishops in the Churches, and [to demonstrate] the succession, of these men to our own times; those who neither taught nor knew of anything like what these [heretics] rave about. For if the apostles had known hidden mysteries, which they were in the habit of imparting to “the perfect” apart and privily from the rest, they would have delivered them especially to those to whom they were also committing the Churches themselves. AH 3, III:1 p415 BKV (SA)
AH 3, III:2
… we do put to confusion all those who … assemble in unauthorized meetings; [we do this, I say,] by indicating that tradition derived from the apostles, of the very great, the very ancient, and universally known Church founded and organized at Rome by the two most glorious apostles, Peter and Paul; as also [by pointing out] the faith preached to men, which comes down to our time by means of the successions of the bishops. AH 3, III:2 p415 BKV (SA)
AH 3, III:3-4
3/ The blessed apostles, then, having founded and built up the Church, committed into the hands of Linus the office of the episcopate. Of this Linus, Paul makes mention in the Epistles to Timothy. To him succeeded Anacletus ; and after him, in the third place from the apostles, Clement was allotted the bishopric. This man, as he had seen the blessed apostles, and had been conversant with them, might be said to have the preaching of the apostles still echoing [in his ears] , and their traditions before his eyes. Nor was he alone [in this], for there were many still remaining who had received instructions from the apostles. In the time of this Clement, no small dissension having occurred among the brethren at Corinth, the Church in Rome despatched a most powerful letter to the Corinthians, exhorting them to peace, renewing their faith, and declaring the tradition which it had lately received from the apostles, proclaiming the one God, omnipotent, the Maker of heaven and earth, the Creator of man, who brought on the deluge, and called Abraham, who led the people from the land of Egypt, spake with Moses, set forth the law,, sent the prophets, and who has prepared fire for the devil and his angels. From this document, whosoever chooses to do so, may learn that He, the Father of our Lord Jesus Christ, was preached by the Churches, and may also understand the apostolical tradition of the Church, since this Epistle is of older date than these men who are now propagating falsehood, and who conjure into existence another god beyond the Creator and the Maker of all existing things. To this Clement there succeeded Evaristus. Alexander followed Evaristus; then, sixth from the apostles, Sixtus was appointed; after him, Telephorus, who was gloriously martyred; then Hyginus; after him, Pius; then after him, Anicetus. Soter having succeeded Anicetus, Eleutherius does now, in the twelfth place from the apostles, hold the inheritance of the episcopate. In this order, and by this succession, the ecclesiastical tradition from the apostles, and the preaching of the truth, have come down to us. And this is most abundant proof that there is one and the same vivifying faith, which has been preserved in the Church from the apostles until now, and handed down in truth.
4/ But Polycarp also was not only instructed by apostles, and conversed with many who had seen Christ, but was also, by apostles in Asia, appointed bishop of the Church in Smyrna, whom I also saw in my early youth, for he tarried [on earth] a very long time, and, when a very old man, gloriously and most nobly suffering martyrdom, departed this life, having always taught the things which he had learned from the apostles, and which the Church has handed down, and which alone are true. To these things all the Asiatic Churches testify, as do also those men who have succeeded Polycarp down to the present time, — a man who was of much greater weight, and a more stedfast witness of truth, than Valentinus, and Marcion, and the rest of the heretics. He it was who, coming to Rome in the time of Anicetus caused many to turn away from the aforesaid heretics to the Church of God, proclaiming that he had received this one and sole truth from the apostles, — that, namely, which is handed down by the Church. There, are also those who heard from him that John, the disciple of the Lord, going to bathe at Ephesus, and perceiving Cerinthus within, rushed out of the bath-house without bathing, exclaiming, “Let us fly, lest even the bath-house fall down, because Cerinthus, the enemy of the truth, is within.” And Polycarp himself replied to Marcion, who met him on one occasion, and said, “Dost thou know me?” “I do know thee, the first-born of Satan.” Such was the horror which the apostles and their disciples had against holding even verbal communication with any corrupters of the truth; as Paul also says, “A man that is an heretic, after the first and second admonition, reject ; knowing that he that is such is subverted, and sinneth, being condemned of himself.” There is also a very powerful Epistle of Polycarp written to the Philippians, from which those who choose to do so, and are anxious about their salvation, can learn the character of his faith, and the preaching of the truth. Then, again, the Church in Ephesus, founded by Paul, and having John remaining among them permanently until the times of Trajan, is a true witness of the tradition of the apostles. AH 3, III:3-4 p416 BKV (SA)
AH 3, IV:1
1/ Since therefore we have such proofs, it is not necessary to seek the truth among others which it is easy to obtain from the Church; since the apostles, like a rich man [depositing his money] in a bank, lodged in her hands most copiously all things pertaining to the truth: … Suppose there arise a dispute relative to some important question among us, should we not have recourse to the most ancient Churches with which the apostles held constant intercourse, and learn from them what is certain and clear in regard to the present question? For how should it be if the apostles themselves had not left us writings? Would it not be necessary, [in that case,] to follow the course of the tradition which they handed down to those to whom they did commit the Churches? AH 3, IV:1 p416-7 BKV (SA)
AH 3, IV:2
Thus, by moans of that ancient tradition of the apostles, they do not suffer their mind to conceive anything of the [doctrines suggested by the] portentous language of these teachers, among whom neither Church nor doctrine has ever been established. AH 3, IV:2 p417 BKV (SA)
AH 3, V:1
1/ Since, therefore, the tradition from the apostles does thus exist in the Church, and is permanent among us, let us revert to the Scriptural proof furnished by those apostles who did also write the Gospel, in which they recorded the doctrine regarding God, pointing out that our Lord Jesus Christ is the truth,[[John 14:6]] and that no lie is in Him. As also David says, prophesying His birth from a virgin, and the resurrection from the dead, “Truth has sprung out of the earth.” The apostles, likewise, being disciples “of the truth, are above all falsehood; for a lie has no fellowship with the truth, just as darkness has none with light, but the presence of the one shuts out that of the other. AH 3, V:1 p417 BKV (AJG - where AJG is an apostle).
AH 3, V:1
Neither did His disciples make mention of any other God, or term any other Lord, except Him, who was truly the God and Lord of all, as these most vain sophists affirm that the apostles did with hypocrisy frame their doctrine according to the capacity of their hearers, … but [[the heretics claim]] to those who are capable of comprehending the unnameable Father, they did declare the unspeakable mystery through parables and enigmas: so that the Lord and the apostles exercised the office of teacher not to further the cause of truth, but even in hypocrisy, and as each individual was able to receive it! AH 3, V:1 p418 BKV (SA)
AH 3, V:2
… For the apostles, who were commissioned to find out the wanderers, and to be for sight to those who saw not, and medicine to the weak, certainly did not address them in accordance with their opinion at the time, but according to revealed truth. AH 3, V:2 p418 BKV (SA)
AH 3, V:3
And again, the apostles taught the Gentiles that they should leave vain stocks and stones, which they imagined to be gods, and worship the true God, … AH 3, V:3 p418 BKV (SA)
AH 3, VI:1
1/ Therefore neither would the Lord, nor the Holy Spirit, nor the apostles, have ever named as God, definitely and absolutely, him who was not God, unless he were truly God … AH 3, VI:1 p418 BKV
AH 3, VI:5
5/ And the Apostle Paul also, saying, “For though ye have served them. which are no gods; ye now know God, or rather, are known of God,” AH 3, VI:5 p420 BKV (Paul)
AH 3, VII:2
2/ From many other instances also, we may discover that the apostle [[Paul]] frequently uses a transposed order in his sentences, due to the rapidity of his discourses, and the impetus of the Spirit which is in him. … So therefore, in such passages, the hyperbaton must be exhibited by the reading, and the apostle’s meaning following on, preserved; … AH 3, VII:2 p420-1 BKV (Paul)
AH 3, VIII:1
1/ This calumny, then, of these men, having been quashed, it is clearly proved that neither the prophets nor the apostles did ever name another God, or call [him] Lord, except the true and only God. AH 3, VIII:1 p421 BKV (SA)
AH 3, IX:1
1/ This, therefore, having been clearly demonstrated here (and it shall yet be so still more clearly), that neither the prophets, nor the apostles, nor the Lord Christ in His own person, did acknowledge any other Lord or God, but the God and Lord supreme: the prophets and the apostles confessing the Father and the Son; but naming no other as God, and confessing no other as Lord : and the Lord Himself handing down to His disciples, that He, the Father, is the only God and Lord, who alone is God and ruler of all; — it is incumbent on us to follow, if we are their disciples indeed, their testimonies to this effect. For Matthew the apostle … declares that John, when preparing the way for Christ, … AH 3, IX:1 p422 BKV (SA, then “Matthew the Apostle”. Notice we never see “John the Apostle”).
AH 3, X:1
1/ Luke also, the follower and disciple of the apostles, … AH 3, X:1 p423 BKV (Paul, SA)
AH 3, XI:1-2 (John reference)
1/ John, the disciple of the Lord, preaches this faith, and seeks, by the proclamation of the Gospel, to remove that error which by Cerinthus had been disseminated among men, and a long time previously by those termed Nicolaitans, who are an offset of that “knowledge” falsely so called, that he might confound them, and persuade them that there is but one God, who made all things by His Word; … The disciple of the Lord therefore desiring to put an end to all such doctrines, and to establish the rule of truth in the Church, that there is one Almighty God, who made all things by his Word, … thus commenced His teaching in the Gospel: “In the beginning was the Word, and the Word was with God, and the Word was God. …” [[John 1:1]] BKV
2/ John, however, does himself put this matter beyond all controversy on our part, when he says, “He was in this world, and the world was; made by Him, and the world knew Him not. He came unto His own [things], and His own [people] received Him not.” [[John 1:10-11]] AH 3, XI:1-2, p426 BKV
AH 3, XI:3 (John as “the Lord’s disciple”)
Therefore the Lord’s disciple, pointing them all out as false witnesses, says, “And the Word was made flesh, and dwelt among us.” [[John 1:14]] AH 3, XI:3, p427 BKV
AH 3, XI:4
Wherefore the Lord said that He deemed him [[John the Baptist]] “more than a prophet.” For all the other prophets preached the advent of the paternal Light, and desired to be worthy of seeing Him whom they preached; but John did both announce [the advent] beforehand, in a like manner as did the others, and actually saw Him when He came, and pointed Him out, and persuaded many to believe on Him, so that he did himself hold the place of both prophet and apostle. For this is to be more than a prophet, because, “first apostles, secondarily prophets;” but all things from one and the same God Himself. AH 3, XI:4 p427 BKV (John the Baptist as apostle, who “saw him when he came”)
AH 3, XI:7-8 (John reference)
7/ … Those, again, who separate Jesus from Christ, alleging that Christ remained impassible, but that it was Jesus who suffered, preferring the Gospel by Mark, if they read it with a love of truth, may have their errors rectified. Those, moreover, who follow Valentinus, making copious use of that according to John, to illustrate their conjunctions, shall be proved to be totally in error by means of this very Gospel, as I have shown in the first book. Since, then, our opponents do bear testimony to us, and make use of these [documents], our proof derived from them is firm and true. BKV
8/ It is not possible that the Gospels can be either more or fewer in number than they are. For, since there are four zones of the world in which we live, and four principal winds, while the Church is scattered throughout all the world, and the “pillar and ground” of the Church is the Gospel and the spirit of life; it is fitting that she should have four pillars, breathing out immortality on every side, and vivifying men afresh. From which fact, it is evident that the Word, the Artificer of all, He that sitteth upon the cherubim, and contains all things, He who was manifested to men, has given us the Gospel under four aspects, but bound together by one Spirit. As also David says, when entreating His manifestation, “Thou that sittest between the cherubim, shine forth.” For the cherubim, too, were four-faced, and their faces were images of the dispensation of the Son of God. For, [as the Scripture] says, “The first living creature was like a lion,” symbolizing His effectual working, His leadership, and royal power; the second [living creature] was like a calf, signifying [His] sacrificial and sacerdotal order; but “the third had, as it were, the face as of a man,” — an evident description of His advent as a human being; “the fourth was like a flying eagle,” pointing out the gift of the Spirit hovering with His wings over the Church. And therefore the Gospels are in accord with these things, among which Christ Jesus is seated. For that according to John relates His original, effectual, and glorious generation from the Father, thus declaring, “In the beginning was the Word, and the Word was with God, and the Word was God.” Also, “all things were made by Him, and without Him was nothing made.” For this reason, too, is that Gospel full of all confidence, for such is His person. AH 3, XI:7,8 p428 BKV
AH 3, XI:9
We must conclude, moreover, that these men (the Montanists) cannot admit the Apostle Paul either. … AH 3, XI:9 p429 BKV (Paul)
AH 3, XI:9
… Indeed, they [[who are from Valentinus]] have arrived at such a pitch of audacity, as to entitle their comparatively recent writing “the Gospel of Truth,” though it agrees in nothing with the Gospels of the Apostles, so that they have really no Gospel which is not full of blasphemy. For if what they have published is the Gospel of truth, and yet is totally unlike those which have been handed down to us from the apostles, any who please may learn, as is shown from the Scriptures themselves, that that which has been handed down from the apostles can no longer be reckoned the Gospel of truth. … let us proceed also to the remaining apostles, and inquire into their doctrine with regard to God; then, in due course we shall listen to the very words of the Lord. AH 3, XI:9 p429 BKV (SA)
AH 3, XI:9 (John reference)
9/ These things being so, all who destroy the form of the Gospel are vain, unlearned, and also audacious; those, [I mean,] who represent the aspects of the Gospel as being either more in number than as aforesaid, or, on the other hand, fewer. The former class [do so], that they may seem to have discovered more than is of the truth; the latter, that they may set the dispensations of God aside. For Marcion, rejecting the entire Gospel, yea rather, cutting himself off from the Gospel, boasts that he has part in the [blessings of] the Gospel. Others, again (the Montanists), that they may set at nought the gift of the Spirit, which in the latter times has been, by the good pleasure of the Father, poured out upon the human race, do not admit that aspect [of the evangelical dispensation] presented by John’s Gospel, in which the Lord promised that He would send the Paraclete; but set aside at once both the Gospel and the prophetic Spirit. AH 3, XI:9 p429 BKV
AH 3, XII:1
1/ The Apostle Peter, therefore, after the resurrection of the Lord, and His assumption into the heavens, being desirous of filling up the number of the twelve apostles, and in electing into the place of Judas any substitute who should be chosen by God, thus addressed those who were present … — thus leading to the completion of the apostles, according to the words spoken by David. AH 3, XII:1 p429-430 BKV (Peter, 12. Notice “The Apostle Peter”)
AH 3, XII:2
… Peter says to them, “Repent, and be baptized every one of you in the name of Jesus for the remission of sins, and ye shall receive the gift of the Holy Ghost.” Thus the apostles did not preach another God, or another Fulness; nor, that the Christ who suffered and rose again was one, while he who flew off on high was another, and remained impassible; but that there was one and the same God the Father, and Christ Jesus who rose from the dead; AH 3, XII:2 p430 BKV (Peter)
AH 3, XII:3 (John reference)
3/ Again, when Peter, accompanied by John, had looked upon the man lame from his birth, before that gate of the temple which is called Beautiful, sitting and seeking alms, he said to him, “Silver and gold I have none; but such as I have give I thee: In the name of Jesus Christ of Nazareth, rise up and walk. And immediately his legs and his feet received strength; and he walked, and entered with them into the temple, walking, and leaping, and praising God.” [[Acts 3:6-8]] AH 3, XII:3, p430 BKV
AH 3, XII:3 (John reference)
Peter, together with John, preached to them this plain message of glad tidings, that the promise which God made to the fathers had been fulfilled by Jesus; … AH 3, XII:3 p431 BKV
AH 3, XII:4-5
4/ For this reason, too, when the chief priests were assembled, Peter, full of boldness, said to them, “Ye rulers of the people, and elders of Israel, …” … thus the apostles did not change God, but preached to the people that Christ was Jesus the crucified One, whom the same God that had sent the prophets, being God Himself, raised up, and gave in Him salvation to men.
5/ They were confounded, therefore, both by this instance of healing (“for the man was above forty years old on whom this miracle of healing took place”), and by the doctrine of the apostles, and by the exposition of the prophets, when the chief priests had sent away Peter and John. [These latter] returned to the rest of their fellow-apostles and disciples of the Lord, that is, to the Church, and related what had occurred, and how courageously they had acted in the name of Jesus. The whole Church, it is then said, “when they had heard that, lifted up the voice to God with one accord, …”. …These [are the] voices of the Church from which every Church had its origin; these are the voices of the metropolis of the citizens of the new covenant; these are the voices of the apostles; these are voices of the disciples of the Lord, the truly perfect, who, after the assumption of the Lord, were perfected by the Spirit, and called upon the God who made heaven, and earth, and the sea, … For it is said, “The place was shaken where they were assembled together; and they were all filled with the Holy Ghost, and they spake the word of God with boldness” to everyone that was willing to believe. “And with great power,” it is added, “gave the apostles witness of the resurrection of the Lord Jesus,” … AH 3, XII:4-5 p431 BKV (Peter, 12. Notice, the “voices of the apostles; these are the voices of the disciples of the Lord, the truly perfect …”)
AH 3, XII:6
6/ But as some of these men impudently assert that the apostles, when preaching among the Jews, could not declare to them another god besides Him in whom they (their hearers) believed, we say to them, that if the apostles used to speak to people in accordance with the opinion instilled into them of old, no one learned the truth from them, nor, at a much earlier date, from the Lord. AH 3, XII:6 p432 BKV (SA)
AH 3, XII:7
7/ From the words of Peter, therefore, which he addressed in Caesarea to Cornelius the centurion, and those Gentiles with him, to whom the word of God was first preached, we can under- stand what the apostles used to preach, the nature of their preaching, and their idea with regard to God. … The apostles, therefore, did preach the Son of God, of whom men were ignorant; … Can it really be, that Peter was not at that time as yet in possession of the perfect knowledge which these men discovered afterwards? According to them, therefore, Peter was imperfect, and the rest of the apostles were imperfect ; and so it would be fitting that they, coming to life again, should become disciples of these men, in order that they too might be made perfect. But this is truly ridiculous. These men, in fact, are proved to be not disciples of the apostles, but of their own wicked notions. To this cause also are due the various opinions which exist among them, inasmuch as each one adopted error just as he was capable [of embracing it]. But the Church throughout all the world, having its origin firm from the apostles, perseveres in one and the same opinion with regard to God and His Son. AH 3, XII:7 p432-3 BKV (Peter - ?12 - SA)
AH 3, XII:9
But that all his [[Paul’s]] Epistles are consonant to these declarations [[from Acts]], I shall, when expounding the apostle, … AH 3, XII:9 p434 BKV (Paul)
AH 3, XII:10
10/ And still further, Stephen, who was chosen the first deacon by the apostles, AH 3, XII:10 p434 BKV (12)
AH 3, XII:11
11/ And that the whole range of the doctrine of the apostles proclaimed one and the same God, … — they who wish may learn from the very words and acts of the apostles, and may contemplate the fact that this God is one, above whom is no other. … But if any one, “doting about questions,” do imagine that what the apostles have declared about God should be allegorized, let him consider my previous statements, in which I set forth one God as the Founder and Maker of all things, and destroyed and laid bare their allegations; and he shall find them agreeable to the doctrine of the apostles, and so to maintain what they used to teach, and were persuaded of, that there is one God, the Maker of all things. AH 3, XII:11 p434 BKV (SA)
AH 3, XII:12
Since, therefore, they have been deserted by the paternal love, and puffed up by Satan, being brought over to the doctrine of Simon Magus, they have apostatized in their opinions from Him who is God, and imagined that they have themselves discovered more than the apostles, by finding out another god; and [maintained] that the apostles preached the Gospel still somewhat under the influence of Jewish opinions, but that they themselves are purer [in doctrine], and more intelligent, than the apostles. AH 3, XII:12 p434 BKV (SA)
AH 3, XII:13
13/ But that both the apostles and their disciples thus taught as the Church preaches, and thus teaching were perfected, wherefore also they were called away to that which is perfect — Stephen, teaching these truths, when he was yet on earth, saw the glory of God, and Jesus on His right hand, and exclaimed, “Behold, I see the heavens opened, and the Son of man standing on the right hand of God.” … AH 3, XII:13 p435 BKV (?12 presumably classifying Stephen as a disciple)
AH 3, XII:13
14/ This is shown in a still clearer light from the letter of the apostles, which they forwarded neither to the Jews nor to the Greeks, but to those who from the Gentiles believed in Christ, confirming their faith. For when certain men had come down from Judea to Antioch — where also, first of all, the Lord’s disciples were called Christians, because of their faith in Christ — and sought to persuade those who had believed on the Lord to be circumcised, and to perform other things after the observance of the law; and when Paul and Barnabas had gone up to Jerusalem to the apostles on account of this question, and the whole Church had convened together, Peter thus addressed them: “Men, brethren, ye know how that from the days of old …” [[Acts 15:7-11]] …
And when these things had been said, and all had given their consent, they wrote to them after this manner: “The apostles, and the presbyters, [and] the brethren, unto those brethren from among the Gentiles who are in Antioch, and Syria, and Cilicia, greeting:” [[Acts 15:22-23]] AH 3, XII:13 p436 BKV (?12-SA)
AH 3, XII:15 (John, apostle reference)
He [[Peter]] persuaded, at the same time, those that were with him, and pointed out that, unless the Holy Ghost had rested upon them, there might have been some one who would have raised objections to their baptism. And the apostles who were with James allowed the Gentiles to act freely, yielding us up to the Spirit of God. But they themselves, while knowing the same God, continued in the ancient observances; so that even Peter, fearing also lest he might incur their reproof, although formerly eating with the Gentiles, because of the vision, and of the Spirit who had rested upon them, yet, when certain persons came from James, withdrew himself, and did not eat with them. And Paul said that Barnabas likewise did the same thing. Thus did the apostles, whom the Lord made witnesses of every action and of every doctrine — for upon all occasions do we find Peter, and James, and John present with Him — scrupulously act according to the dispensation of the Mosaic law, showing that it was from one and the same God …” AH 3, XII:15 p436 BKV (12)
AH 3, XIII:1
1/ With regard to those (the Marcionites) who allege that Paul alone knew the truth, and that to him the mystery was manifested by revelation, let Paul himself convict them, when he says, that one and the same God wrought in Peter for the apostolate of the circumcision, and in himself for the Gentiles. Peter, therefore, was an apostle of that very God whose was also Paul; and Him whom Peter preached as God among those of the circumcision, and likewise the Son of God, did Paul [declare] also among the Gentiles. For our Lord never came to save Paul alone, nor is God so limited in means, that He should have but one apostle who knew the dispensation of His Son. AH 3, XIII:1 p436 BKV (Paul, Peter)
AH 3, XIII:2-3
For why did the Lord send the twelve apostles to the lost sheep of the house of Israel, if these men did not know the truth? How also did the seventy preach, unless they had themselves previously known the truth of what was preached? Or how could Peter have been in ignorance, to whom the Lord gave testimony, that flesh and blood had not revealed to him, but the Father, who is in heaven? Just, then, as “Paul [was] an apostle, not of men, neither by man, but by Jesus Christ, and God the Father,” [so with the rest;] the Son indeed leading them to the Father, but the Father revealing to them the Son.
3/ But that Paul acceded to [the request of] those who summoned him to the apostles, on account of the question [which had been raised], and went up to them, with Barnabas, to Jerusalem, not without reason, but that the liberty of the Gentiles might be confirmed by them, he does himself say, in the Epistle to the Galatians: … If, then, any one shall, from the Acts of the Apostles, carefully scrutinize the time concerning which it is written that he went up to Jerusalem on account of the forementioned question, he will find those years mentioned by Paul coinciding with it. Thus the statement of Paul harmonizes with, and is, as it were, identical with, the testimony of Luke regarding the apostles. AH 3, XIII:2-3 p437 BKV (12, Paul)
AH 3, XIV:1
That he [[Luke]] was not merely a follower, but also a fellow-labourer of the apostles, but especially of Paul, Paul has himself declared also in the Epistles, … AH 3, XIV:1 p437-8 BKV (SA)
AH 3, XIV:2
“I have not shunned,” he [[Paul, Acts 20:27]] says, “to declare unto you all the counsel of God.” Thus did the apostles simply, and without respect of persons, deliver to all what they had themselves learned from the Lord. AH 3, XIV:2 p438 BKV (Paul, SA)
AH 3, XIV:4
But the followers of Valentinus must give up their utterly vain talk; for they have taken from that [Gospel] many occasions for their own speculations, to put an evil interpretation upon what he has well said. If, on the other hand, they feel compelled to receive the remaining portions also, then, by studying the perfect Gospel, and the doctrine of the apostles, they will find it necessary to repent, that they may be saved from the danger [to which they are exposed]. AH 3, XIV:4 p439 BKV (SA)
AH 3, XV:1
1/ But again, we allege the same against those who do not recognise Paul as an apostle: that they should either reject the other words of the Gospel which we have come to know through Luke alone, and not make use of them; or else, if they do receive all these, they must necessarily admit also that testimony concerning Paul, … AH 3, XV:1 p439 BKV (Paul)
AH 3, XV:1
Those, therefore, who do not accept of him [[Paul]] [as a teacher], who was chosen by God for this purpose, that he might boldly bear His name, as being sent to the forementioned nations, do despise the election of God, and separate themselves from the company of the apostles. For neither can they contend that Paul was no apostle, when he was chosen for this purpose; nor can they prove Luke guilty of falsehood, when he proclaims the truth to us with all diligence. It may be, indeed, that it was with this view that God set forth very many Gospel truths, through Luke’s instrumentality, which all should esteem it necessary to use, in order that all persons, following his subsequent testimony, which treats upon the acts and the doctrine of the apostles, and holding the unadulterated rule of truth, may be saved. His testimony, therefore, is true, and the doctrine of the apostles is open and stedfast, holding nothing in reserve; nor did they teach one set of doctrines in private, and another in public. AH 3, XV:1 p439 BKV (Paul, SA)
AH 3, XV:3
3/ But let us revert to the same line of argument [hitherto pursued]. For when it has been manifestly declared, that they who were the preachers of the truth and the apostles of liberty termed no one else God, or named him Lord, except the only true God the Father, and His Word, who has the pre-eminence in all things; it shall then be clearly proved, that they (the apostles) confessed as the Lord God Him who was the Creator of heaven and earth, who also spoke with Moses, gave to him the dispensation of the law, and who called the fathers; and that they knew no other. The opinion of the apostles, therefore, and of those (Mark and Luke)2 who learned from their words, concerning God, has been made manifest. AH 3, XV:3 p440 BKV (SA, but Mark and Luke distinguished from the apostles, implying Matthew and John are apostles).
AH 3, XVI:1-2
1/ But there are some who say that Jesus was merely a receptacle of Christ, upon whom the Christ, as a dove, descended from above, … I judge it necessary therefore to take into account the entire mind of the apostles regarding our Lord Jesus Christ, and to show that not only did they never hold any such opinions regarding Him; but, still further, that they announced through the Holy Spirit, that those who should teach such doctrines were agents of Satan, sent forth for the purpose of overturning the faith of some, and drawing them away from life.
2/ That John knew the one and the same Word of God, and that He was the only begotten, and that he became incarnate for our salvation, Jesus Christ our Lord, I have sufficiently proved from the word of John himself. And Matthew, too, recognising one and the same Jesus Christ, exhibiting his generation as a man from the Virgin, even as God did promise David that He would raise up from the fruit of his body an eternal King, having made the same promise to Abraham a long time previously, says: “The book of the generation of Jesus Christ, the son of David, the son of Abraham.” AH 3, XVI:1-2 p440 BKV (AJG is an apostle, as is Matthew)
AH 3, XVI:3
3/ Paul, when writing to the Romans, has explained this very point: “Paul, an apostle of Jesus Christ, predestinated unto the Gospel of God, which He had promised by His prophets in the holy Scriptures, concerning His Son, …” AH 3, XVI:3 p441 BKV (Paul of himself)
AH 3, XVI:5 (His disciples)
Therefore did the Lord also say to His disciples after the resurrection, “O thoughtless ones, and slow of heart to believe all that the prophets have spoken ! Ought not Christ to have suffered these things, and to enter into His glory?” [[Luke 24:25-26]] AH 3, XVI:5, p442 BKV
AH 3, XVI:5 (John reference)
The Gospel, therefore, knew no other son of man but Him who was of Mary, who also suffered; and no Christ who flew away from Jesus before the passion; but Him who was born it knew as Jesus Christ the Son of God, and that this same suffered and rose again, as John, the disciple of the Lord, verifies, saying: “But these are written, that ye might believe that Jesus is the Christ, the Son of God, and that believing ye might have eternal life in His name,” [[John 20:31]] … AH 3, XVI:5, p442 BKV
AH 3, XVI:8 (John as “His disciple”)
These are they against whom the Lord has cautioned us beforehand; and His disciple, in his Epistle already mentioned, commands us to avoid them, when he says: “For many deceivers are entered into the world, who confess not that Jesus Christ is come in the flesh. This is a deceiver and an antichrist. Take heed to them, that ye lose not what ye have wrought.” [[2 John 1:7-8]] And again does he say in the Epistle: “Many false prophets are gone out into the world. Hereby know ye the Spirit of God: Every spirit that confesseth that Jesus Christ is come in the flesh is of God; and every spirit which separates Jesus Christ is not of God, but is of antichrist.” [[2 John 4:1-3]] These words agree with what was said in the Gospel, that “the Word was made flesh, and dwelt among us.” [[John 1:14]]
Wherefore he again exclaims in his Epistle, “Every one that believeth that Jesus is the Christ, has been born of God;” [[1 John 5:1]] AH 3, XVI:8, p443 BKV
AH 3, XVI:9
But that the apostle did know Him as one, both who was born and who suffered, namely Christ Jesus, he again says in the same Epistle: “Know ye not, that so many of us as were baptized in Christ Jesus were baptized in His death? that like as Christ rose from the dead, so should we also walk in newness of life.” [[Romans VI:3-4]] AH 3, XVI:9 p443 BKV (Paul)
AH 3, XVII:1
1/ It certainly was in the power of the apostles to declare that Christ descended upon Jesus, or that the so-called superior Saviour [came down] upon the dispensational one, or he who is from the invisible places upon him from the Demiurge; but they neither knew nor said anything of the kind: [[then quotes Matthew 10:20, Matthew 28:19]]. AH 3, XVII:1 p444 BKV (Matthew)
AH 3, XVII:4
4/ The Spirit, therefore, descending under the predestined dispensation, and the Son of God, the Only-begotten, who is also the Word of the Father, coming in the fulness of time, having become incarnate in man for the sake of man, and fulfilling all the conditions of human nature, our Lord Jesus Christ being one and the same, as He Himself the Lord doth testify, as the apostles confess, and as the prophets announce, … AH 3, XVII:4 p445 BKV (SA)
AH 3, XIX:2
But that He is Himself in His own right, beyond all men who ever lived, God, and Lord, and King Eternal, and the incarnate Word, proclaimed by all the prophets, the apostles, and by the Spirit Himself, may be seen by all who have attained to even a small portion of the truth. Now, the Scriptures would not have testified these things of Him, if, like others, He had been a mere man. [[Various OT quotes follow]] AH 3, XIX:2 p449 BKV (SA)
AH 3, XXI:3-4
For the apostles, since they are of more ancient date than all these [heretics], agree with this aforesaid translation [[of Isiah 7:14]]; and the translation harmonizes with the tradition of the apostles. For Peter, and John, and Matthew, and Paul, and the rest successively, as well as their followers, did set forth all prophetical [announcements], just as the interpretation of the elders contains them.
4/ For the one and the same Spirit of God who proclaimed by the prophets what and of what sort the advent of the Lord should be, did by these elders give a just interpretation of what had been truly prophesied; and He did Himself, by the apostles, announce that the fulness of the times of the adoption had arrived, that the kingdom of heaven had drawn nigh, and that He was dwelling within those that believe on Him who was born Emmanuel of the Virgin. AH 3, XXI:3-4 p452 BKV (Isaiah 7:14 only cited by Matthew; John’s gospel does not refer to the Virgin birth - presumably either confusion, or oral testimony).
AH 3, XXII:1
The Apostle Paul, moreover, in the Epistle to the Galatians, … AH 3, XXII:1 p454 BKV (Paul)
AH 3, XXII:2 (John reference)
… nor, again, would John His disciple have said, when writing of Him, “But Jesus, being wearied with the journey, was sitting [to rest];” … [[John 4:6]] AH 3, XXII:2 p454 BKV
AH 3, XXIV:1
But [it has, on the other hand, been shown], that the preaching of the Church is everywhere consistent, and continues in an even course, and receives testimony from the prophets, the apostles, and all the disciples … “For in the Church,” it is said, “od hath set apostles, prophets, teachers,” [[1 Corinithians 12:28]] and all the other means through which the Spirit works; AH 3, XXIV:1 p458 BKV (SA)
AH 4, Preface:1
And since they allege that the Creator originated from a defect or apostasy, so have they also taught that Christ and the Holy Spirit were emitted on account of this defect, and that the Saviour was a product of those Aeons who were produced from a defect; so that there is nothing but blasphemy to be found among them. In the preceding book, then, the ideas of the apostles as to all these points have been set forth, [to the effect] that not only did they, “who from the beginning were eye-witnesses and ministers of the word” [[Luke 1:2]] of truth, hold no such opinions, but that they did also preach to us to shun these doctrines, [[2 Timothy 2:23]] foreseeing by the Spirit those weak-minded persons who should be led astray. AH 4, Preface:1 p462 BKV (SA)
AH 4, I:1
… and likewise that the apostles did of themselves term no one else as God, or name [no other] as Lord … AH 4, I:1 p463 BKV (SA)
AH 4, I:2
The apostles, too, according to these men’s showing, are proved to be transgressors of the commandment, since they confess the Creator as God, and Lord, and Father, as I have shown — if He is not alone God and Father. Jesus, therefore, will be to them the author and teacher of such transgression, inasmuch as He commanded: that one Being should be called Father, [[Matthew 23:9]] thus imposing upon them the necessity of confessing the Creator as their Father, as has been pointed out. AH 4 I:2 p463 BKV (Matthew, SA)
AH 4, II:3 (John reference)
3/ But since the writings (literae) of Moses are the words of Christ, He does Himself declare to the Jews, as John has recorded in the Gospel: “If ye had believed Moses, ye would have believed Me: for he wrote of Me. But if ye believe not his writings, neither will ye believe My words.” [[John 5:46-47]] AH 4, II:3 p464 BKV
AH 4, IV:1
The fruit, therefore, having been sown throughout all the world, she (Jerusalem) was deservedly forsaken, and those things which had formerly brought forth fruit abundantly were taken away; for from these, according to the flesh, were Christ and the apostles enabled to bring forth fruit. AH 4, IV:1 p466 BKV (SA)
AH 4, V:4
4/ Righteously also the apostles, being of the race of Abraham, left the ship and their father, and followed the Word. AH 4, V:4 p467 BKV
AH 4, VI:1 (John, apostle reference)
1/ For the Lord, revealing Himself to His disciples, that He Himself is the Word, who imparts knowledge of the Father, and reproving the Jews, who imagined that they had [the knowledge of] God, while they nevertheless rejected His Word, through whom God is made known, declared, “No man knoweth the Son, but the Father; neither knoweth any man the Father, save the Son, and he to whom the Son has willed to reveal [Him].” [[Matthew 11:27; Luke 10:22]] Thus hath Matthew set it down, and Luke in like manner, and Mark [[see Roberts footnote below]] the very same; for John omits this passage. They, however, who would be wiser than the apostles, write [the verse] in the following manner: “No man knew the Father, but the Son; nor the Son, but the Father, and he to whom the Son has willed to reveal [Him];” … AH 4, VI:1 p468 BKV (maybe Matthew and AJG)
Roberts footnote: “Not now to be found in Mark’s Gospel.”
AH 4, VIII:3
For David had been appointed a priest by God, although Saul persecuted him. For all the righteous possess the sacerdotal rank. And all the apostles of the Lord are priests, who do inherit here neither lands nor houses, but serve God and the altar continually. AH 4, VIII:3 p471 BKV (SA)
AH 4, X:1 (John reference)
1/ Wherefore also John does appropriately relate that the Lord said to the Jews: “Ye search the Scriptures, in which ye think ye have eternal life; these are they which testify of me. And ye are not willing to come unto Me, that ye may have life.” [[John 5:39-40]] AH 4, X:1 p473 BKV
AH 4, XII:5
…, the Lord, exposing his covetousness, said to him, “If thou wilt be perfect, go, sell all that thou hast, and distribute to the poor; and come, follow me;” promising to those who would act thus, the portion belonging to the apostles (apostolorum partem). AH 4, XII:5 p476 BKV (SA)
AH 4, XIV:2 (John reference)
Thus, in a variety of ways, He adjusted the human race to an agreement with salvation. On this account also does John declare in the Apocalypse, “And His voice as the sound of many waters.” [[Revelation 1:15]] AH 4, XIV:2, p479 BKV
AH 4, XV:1
Luke also has recorded that Stephen, who was the first elected into the diaconate by the apostles, and who was the first slain for the testimony of Christ, spoke regarding Moses as follows … AH 4, XV:1 p480 BKV (12)
AH 4, XV:2
But why say I these things [[adaptation for hardness of heart]] concerning the Old Testament? For in the New also are the apostles found doing this very thing, on the ground which has been mentioned, Paul plainly declaring, “But these things I say, not the Lord.” And again: “But this I speak by permission, not by commandment.” And again: “Now, as concerning virgins, I have no commandment from the Lord; yet I give my judgment, as one that hath obtained mercy of the Lord to be faithful.” But further, in another place he says: “That Satan tempt you not for your incontinence.” If, therefore, even in the New Testament, the apostles are found granting certain precepts in consideration of human infirmity, because of the incontinence of some, … AH 4, XV:2 p480 BKV (Paul)
AH 4, XVI:1
For “we,” says the apostle, “have been circumcised with the circumcision made without hands.” [[Colossians 2:11]] And the prophet declares, “Circumcise the hardness of your heart.” But the Sabbaths taught that we should continue day by day in God’s service. “For we have been counted,” says the Apostle Paul, “all the day long as sheep for the slaughter;” AH 4, XVI:1 p482 BKV (Paul)
AH 4, XVII:5
And the cup likewise, which is part of that creation to which we belong, He confessed to be His blood, and taught the new oblation of the new covenant ; which the Church receiving from the apostles, offers to God throughout all the world, AH 4, XVII:5 p484 BKV (SA)
AH 4, XVII:6 (John reference)
Since, therefore, the name of the Son belongs to the Father, and since in the omnipotent God the Church makes offerings through Jesus Christ, He says well on both these grounds, “And in every place incense is offered to My name, and a pure sacrifice.” Now John, in the Apocalypse, declares that the “incense” is “the prayers of the saints.” [[Revelation 5:8]] AH 4, XVII:6 p484 BKV
AH 4, XVIII:6 (John reference)
The altar, then, is in heaven (for towards that place are our prayers and oblations directed); the temple likewise [is there], as John says in the Apocalypse, “And the temple of God was opened:” [[Revelation 11:19]] the tabernacle also: “For, behold,” He says, “the tabernacle of God, in which He will dwell with men.” [[Revelation 21:3]] AH 4, XVIII:6 p486 BKV
AH 4, XX:2
In accordance with this, too, does the apostle say, “There is one God, the Father, who is above all, and in us all.” [[Ephesians 4:6]]. AH 4, XX:2 p488 BKV (Paul)
AH 4, XX:6
But the apostle expounded this very passage, when he said, “Now there are diversities of gifts, but the same Spirit; …” [[1 Corinthians 12:4]] AH 4, XX:6 p489 BKV (Paul)
AH 4, XX:11 (John reference)
John also, the Lord’s disciple, when beholding the sacerdotal and glorious advent of His kingdom, says in the Apocalypse: “I turned to see the voice that spake with me …” … But when John could not endure the sight (for he says, “I fell at his feet as dead;” [[Revelation 1:17]] that what was written r might come to pass: “No man sees God, and shall live” [[Exodus 33:20]]), and the Word reviving him, and reminding him that it was He upon whose bosom he had leaned at supper, when he put the question as to who should betray Him, declared: “I am the first and the last, and He who liveth, and was dead, and behold I am alive for evermore, and have the keys of death and of hell.” [[Revelation 1:17]] AH 4, XX:11 p491 BKV
AH 4, XX:12
And for this reason, Paul declares that the “unbelieving wife is sanctified by the believing husband.” Then again, the prophet names his children, “Not having obtained mercy,” and “Not a people,” in order that, as says the apostle, “what was not a people may become a people; and she who did not obtain mercy may obtain mercy. And it shall come to pass, that in the place where it was said, This is not a people, there shall they be called the children of the living God.” That which had been done typically through his actions by the prophet, the apostle proves to have been done truly by Christ in the Church. AH 4, XX:12 p492 BKV (Paul)
AH 4, XXI:1-2
1/ But that our faith was also prefigured in Abraham, and that he was the patriarch of our faith, and, as it were, the prophet of it, the apostle has very fully taught, when he says in the Epistle to the Galatians “He therefore that ministereth to you the Spirit, … So then they which be of faith shall be blessed with faithful Abraham.” For which [reasons the apostle] declared that this man was not only the prophet of faith, …
2/ The history of Isaac, too, is not without a symbolical character. For in the Epistle to the Romans, the apostle declares AH 4, XXI:1-2 p492-3 BKV (Paul)
AH 4, XXI:3 (John reference)
For to this end was the Lord born, the type of whose birth he set forth beforehand, of whom also John says in the Apocalypse: “He went forth conquering, that He should conquer.” [[Revelation 6:2]] AH 4, XXI:3, p493 BKV
AH 4, XXIII:2
For this reason, too, did the apostles, collecting the sheep which had perished of the house of Israel, and discoursing to them from the Scriptures, prove that this crucified Jesus was the Christ, the Son of the living God; AH 4, XXIII:2 p495 BKV (SA)
AH 4, XXIV:1
1/ Wherefore also Paul, since he was the apostle of the Gentiles, says, … As I have pointed out in the preceding book, the apostle did, in the first place, instruct the Gentiles to depart from the superstition of idols, AH 4, XXIV:1 p495 BKV (Paul)
AH 4, XXVI:2
2/ Wherefore it is incumbent to obey the presbyters who are in the Church, — those who, as I have shown, possess the succession from the apostles; those who, together with the succession of the episcopate, have received the certain gift of truth, according to the good pleasure of the Father. AH 4, XXVI:2 p497 BKV (SA)
AH 4, XXVI:4
4/ From all such persons, therefore, it behoves us to keep aloof, but to adhere to those who, as I have already observed, do hold the doctrine of the apostles, and who, together with the order of priesthood (presbyterii ordine), display sound speech and blameless conduct for the confirmation and correction of others. AH 4, XXVI:4 p497 BKV (SA)
AH 4, XXVI:4
In this strain also the Apostle Paul, inasmuch as he had a good conscience, said to the Corinthians … AH 4, XXVI:4 p498 BKV (Paul)
AH 4, XXVI:5
Paul then, teaching us where one may find such [[faithful servants]], says, “God hath placed in the Church, first, apostles; secondly, prophets ; thirdly, teachers.” Where, therefore, the gifts of the Lord have been placed, there it behoves us to learn the truth, [namely,] from those who possess that succession of the Church which is from the apostles, and among whom exists that which is sound and blameless in conduct, as well as that which is unadulterated and incorrupt in speech. AH 4, XXVI:5 p498 BKV (SA)
AH 4, XXVII:1
1/ As I have heard from a certain presbyter, who had heard it from those who had seen the apostles, and from those who had been their disciples, the punishment [declared] in Scripture was sufficient for the ancients in regard to what they did without the Spirit’s guidance. AH 4, XXVII:1 p498 BKV (SA)
AH 4, XXVII:4
4/ Since therefore, beyond all doubt and contradiction, the apostle [[following quote of 1 Corinthians]] shows that there is one and the same God, … and the apostle says, “Know ye not that the unrighteous shall not inherit the kingdom of God? …” [[1 Corinthians 6:9]] … And again does the apostle say, “Let no man deceive you with vain words; …” [[Ephesians 5:6]] … here also does the apostle likewise say: “For the wrath of God shall be revealed from heaven …” [[Romans 1:18] … So says the apostle, in like manner, in the Epistle to the Thessalonians: … AH 4, XXVII:4 p500 BKV (Paul)
AH 4, XXVIII:3
For if He had not so come, it follows that these men could not have become the slayers of their Lord; and if He had not sent prophets to them, they certainly could not have killed them, nor the apostles either. AH 4, XXVIII:3 p501 BKV (SA)
AH 4, XXVIII:3
Unless, then, the Jews had become the slayers of the Lord (which did, indeed, take eternal life away from them), and, by killing the apostles and persecuting the Church, had fallen into an abyss of wrath, we could not have been saved. AH 4, XXVIII:3 p501 BKV (SA)
AH 4, XXVIII:3
For the apostle does also say in the Second [Epistle] to the Corinthians: AH 4, XXVIII:3 p501 BKV (Paul)
AH 4, XXIX:1
In accordance with this word, therefore, does the apostle say, in the Second [Epistle] to the Corinthians: AH 4, XXIX:1 p502 BKV (Paul)
AH 4, XXX:4 (John reference)
And if any one will devote a close attention to those things which are stated by the prophets with regard to the [time of the] end and those which John the disciple of the Lord saw in the Apocalypse, he will find that the nations [are to] receive the same plagues universally, as Egypt then did particularly. AH 4, XXX:4 p504 BKV
AH 4, XXXII:1
1/ After this fashion also did a presbyter [[perhaps Polycarp]] a disciple of the apostles, reason with respect to the two testaments, proving that both were truly from one and the same God. AH 4, XXXII:1 p505 BKV (SA)
AH 4, XXXII:1
… and the Apostle Paul [says] in like manner, “There is one Lord, one faith, one baptism, one God and Father, who is above all, and through all, and in us all” [[Ephesians 4:5-6]] AH 4, XXXII:1 p506 BKV (Paul)
AH 4, XXXII:2
2/ For all the apostles taught that there were indeed two testaments among the two peoples; but that it was one and the same God who appointed both for the advantage of those men (for whose sakes the testaments were given) who were to believe in God, I have proved in the third book from the very teaching of the apostles; and that the first testament was not given without reason, or to no purpose, or in an accidental sort of manner; AH 4, XXXII:2 p506 BKV (SA)
AH 4, XXXIII:8
8/ True knowledge is [that which consists in] the doctrine of the apostles, and the ancient constitution s of the Church throughout all the world, AH 4, XXXIII:8 p508 BKV (SA)
AH 4, XXXIII:11
And the apostle in like manner says [of them], “Who shall be punished with everlasting death from the face of the Lord, …” [[2 Thessalonians 1:9]] AH 4, XXXIII:11 p509 BKV (Paul)
AH 4, XXXIV:1
… read with earnest care that Gospel which has been conveyed to us by the apostles, and read with earnest care the prophets, and you will find that the whole conduct, and all the doctrine, and all the sufferings of our Lord, were predicted through them. AH 4, XXXIV:1 p511 BKV (SA)
AH 4, XXXIV:2
To this effect, also Paul, His apostle, says in the Epistle to the Romans, … AH 4, XXXIV:2 p511 BKV (Paul)
AH 4, XXXIV:4
But if the law of liberty, that is, the word of God, preached by the apostles (who went forth from Jerusalem) throughout all the earth, … AH 4, XXXIV:4 p512 BKV (SA)
AH 4, XXXV:2
2/ But if, when the Saviour came to this earth, He sent His apostles into the world to proclaim with accuracy His advent, and to teach the Father’s will, … Therefore let them not any longer assert that Peter and Paul and the other apostles proclaimed the truth, but that it was the scribes and Pharisees, and the others, through whom the law was propounded. But if, at His advent, He sent forth His own apostles in the spirit of truth, and not in that of error, He did the very same also in the case of the prophets … AH 4, XXXV:2 p513 BKV (?12, SA)
AH 4, XXXVI:3
…; on which day He [[Jesus]] declares that it shall be more tolerable for Sodom and Gomorrah than for that city and house which shall not receive the word of His apostles. AH 4, XXXVI:3 p516 BKV (12)
AH 4, XXXVI:5
The Lord, therefore, who has called us everywhere by the apostles, is He who called those of old by the prophets, as appears by the words of the Lord; and although they preached to various nations, the prophets were not from one God, and the apostles from another; but, [proceeding] from one and the same, some of them announced the Lord, others preached the Father, and others again foretold the advent of the Son of God, while yet others declared Him as already present to those who then were afar off. AH 4, XXXVI:5 p517 BKV (SA)
AH 4, XXXVI:6
… for this is the wedding garment, of which also the apostle speaks, “Not for that we would be unclothed, but clothed upon, that mortality might be swallowed up by immortality.” [[2 Corinthians 5:5]] … Wherefore also the Apostle Paul says in the Epistle to the Romans, “… Wherefore ye must needs be subject, not only for wrath, but also for conscience sake. For this cause pay ye tribute also; for they are God’s ministers, attending continually upon this very thing.” Both the Lord, then, and the apostles announce as the one only God the Father, Him who gave the law … AH 4, XXXVI:6 p517 BKV (Paul)
AH 4, XXXVI:8
If, then, those who do believe in Him through the preaching of His apostles throughout the east and west shall recline with Abraham, Isaac, and Jacob, in the kingdom of heaven, … AH 4, XXXVI:8 p518 BKV (SA)
AH 4, XXXVII:1
… Rejecting therefore the good, and as it were spuing it out, they shall all deservedly incur the just judgment of God, which also the Apostle Paul testifies in his Epistle to the Romans, …” “But glory and honour,” he says, “to every one that doeth good.” [[Romans 2:7]] God therefore has given that which is good, as the apostle tells us in this Epistle, … AH 4, XXXVII:1 p518-9 BKV (Paul)
AH 4, XXXVII:4
If then [[quoting 1 Corinthians 6]] it were not in our power to do or not to do these things, what reason had the apostle, and much more the Lord Himself, to give us counsel to do some things, and to abstain from others? AH 4, XXXVII:4 p519 BKV (Paul)
AH 4, XXXVII:7
On this account also Paul the Apostle says to the Corinthians, “Know ye not, that they who run in a racecourse, do all indeed run, but one receiveth the prize? …” … Since, then, this power has been conferred upon us, both the Lord has taught and the apostle has enjoined us the more to love God, that we may reach this [prize] for ourselves by striving after it. AH 4, XXXVII:7 p520 BKV (Paul)
AH 4, XXXVIII:2
2/ And on this account does Paul declare to the Corinthians, “I have fed you with milk, not with meat, for hitherto ye were not able to bear it.” … As, therefore, the apostle had the power to give them strong meat — for those upon whom the apostles laid hands received the Holy Spirit, who is the food of life [eternal] — … AH 4, XXXVIII:2 p521 BKV (Paul)
AH 4, XLI:4
But it is necessary to subjoin to this composition, in what follows [[book 5 of AH]], also the doctrine of Paul after the words of the Lord, to examine the opinion of this man, and expound the apostle, … and to demonstrate from that same Paul, from whose [writings] they press questions upon us, that they are indeed utterers of falsehood, but that the apostle was a preacher of the truth, and that he taught all things agreeable to the preaching of the truth; … Arranging, then, in another book, the rest of the words of the Lord, which He taught concerning the Father not by parables, but by expressions taken in their obvious meaning (sed simpliciter ipsis dictionibus), and the exposition of the Epistles of the blessed apostle, I shall, with God’s aid, furnish thee with the complete work of the exposure and refutation of knowledge, falsely so called … AH 4, XLI:4 p525 BKV (Paul)
AH 5, Preface
Then I have pointed out the truth, and shown the preaching of the Church, which the prophets proclaimed (as I have already demonstrated), but which Christ brought to perfection, and the apostles have handed down, from whom the Church, receiving [these truths], and throughout all the world alone preserving them in their integrity (bene), has transmitted them to her sons. Then also — having disposed of all questions which the heretics propose to us, and having explained the doctrine of the apostles, and clearly set forth many of those things which were said and done by the Lord in parables … AH 5, Preface p526 BKV (SA)
AH 5, II:2
By His own blood he redeemed us, as also His apostle declares, “In whom we have redemption through His blood, even the remission of sins.” [[Colossians 1:14]] AH 5, II:2 p528 BKV (Paul)
AH 5, III:1
The Apostle Paul has, moreover, in the most lucid manner, pointed out … in the second [Epistle] to the Corinthians: “… Gladly therefore shall I rather glory in infirmities, that the power of Christ may dwell in me.” What, therefore? (as some may exclaim:) did the Lord wish, in that case, that His apostles should thus undergo buffeting, and that he should endure such infirmity? Even so it was; the word says it. AH 5, III:1 p529 BKV (Paul, SA)
AH 5, V:1
In paradise certainly, as the Scripture declares: “And God planted a garden [paradisum] eastward in Eden, and there He placed the man whom He had formed.” And then afterwards, when [man] proved disobedient, he was cast out thence into this world. Wherefore also the elders who were disciples of the apostles tell us that those who were translated were transferred to that place (for paradise has been prepared for righteous men, such as have the Spirit; in which place also Paul the apostle, when he was caught up, heard words which are unspeakable as regards us in our present condition), and that there shall they who have been translated remain until the consummation [of all things], as a prelude to immortality. AH 5, V:1 p531 BKV (SA, Paul)
AH 5, VI:1
For this reason does the apostle declare, “We speak wisdom among them that are perfect,” [[1 Corinthians 2:6]] … In like manner we do also hear many brethren in the Church, who possess prophetic gifts, and who through the Spirit speak all kinds of languages, and bring to light for the general benefit the hidden things of men, and declare the mysteries of God, whom also the apostle terms “spiritual,” … AH 5 VI:1 p531 BKV (Paul)
AH 5, VI:1
And for this cause does the apostle, explaining himself, make it clear that the saved man is a complete man as well as a spiritual man; saying thus in the first Epistle to the Thessalonians, … AH 5 VI:1 p532 BKV (Paul)
AH 5, VI:2
And not only does he (the apostle) acknowledge our bodies to be a temple, but even the temple of Christ, saying thus to the Corinthians, “Know ye not that your bodies are members of Christ? …” AH 5 VI:2 p532 BKV (Paul)
AH 5, VIII:1
1/ But we do now receive a certain portion of His Spirit, tending towards perfection, and preparing us for incorruption, being little by little accustomed to receive and bear God; which also the apostle terms “an earnest,” that is, a part of the honour which has been promised us by God, where he says in the Epistle to the Ephesians, … AH 5, VIII:1 p533 BKV (Paul)
AH 5, XVIII:2 (John reference)
And to these things does John also, the disciple of the Lord, bear witness, when he speaks thus in the Gospel: “In the beginning was the Word, and the Word was with God, and the Word was God. This was in the beginning with God. All things were made by Him, and without Him was nothing made.” [[John 1:1-3]] And then he said of the Word Himself: “He was in the world, and the world was made by Him, and the world knew Him not. To His own things He came, and His own people received Him not. However, as many as did receive Him, to these gave He power to become the sons of God, to those that believe in His name.” [[John 1:10-13]] And again, showing the dispensation with regard to His human nature, John said: “And the Word was made flesh, and dwelt among us.” [[John 1:14]] AH 5, XVIII:2 p546 BKV
AH 5, XX:1
1/ Now all these [heretics] are of much later date than the bishops to whom the apostles committed the Churches; which fact I have in the third book taken all pains to demonstrate. … But the path of those belonging to the Church circumscribes the whole world, as possessing the sure tradition from the apostles, and gives unto us to see that the faith of all is one and the same, since all receive one and the same God the Father, … AH 5, XX:1 p547-8 BKV (SA)
AH 5, XXV:2
Now I have shown in the third book, that no one is termed God by the apostles when speaking for themselves, except Him who truly is God, the Father of our Lord, AH 5, XXV:2 p553 BKV (SA)
AH 5, XXVI:1 (John reference)
1/ In a still clearer light has John, in the Apocalypse, indicated to the Lord’s disciples what shall happen in the last times, and concerning the ten kings who shall then arise, among whom the empire which now rules [the earth] shall be partitioned. AH 5, XXVI:1 p554 BKV
AH 5, XXVI:2
That before the Lord’s appearance Satan never dared to blaspheme God, inasmuch as he did not yet know his own sentence, because it was contained in parables and allegories; but that after the Lord’s appearance, when he had clearly ascertained from the words of Christ and His apostles that eternal fire has been prepared for him as he apostatized from God of his own free-will, and likewise for all who unrepentant continue in the apostasy, he now blasphemes, … AH 5, XXVI:2 p555 BKV
AH 5, XXVIII:2 (John reference)
… and at the proper time sending such a man, “that they may believe a lie, that they all may be judged who did not believe the truth, but consented to unrighteousness;” whose coming John has thus described in the Apocalypse: “And the beast which I had seen was like unto a leopard, and his feet as of a bear, and his mouth as the mouth of a lion; …” [[Revelation 13:2]] John says further: “And he shall order an image of the beast to be made, and he shall give breath to the image, so that the image shall speak; and he shall cause those to be slain who will not adore it.” AH 5, XXVIII:2 p557 BKV
AH 5, XXX:1 (John reference)
1/ Such, then, being the state of the case, and this number being found in all the most approved and ancient copies [of the Apocalypse], and those men who saw John face to face bearing their testimony [to it]; while reason also leads us to conclude that the number of the name of the beast, [if reckoned] according to the Greek mode of calculation by the [value of] the letters, contained in it, will amount to six hundred and sixty and six;… AH 5, XXX:1 p558 BKV
AH 5, XXXIII:4 (John reference)
The predicted blessing, therefore, belongs unquestionably to the times of the kingdom, when the righteous shall bear rule upon their rising from the dead; when also the creation, having been renovated and set free, shall fructify with an abundance of all kinds of food, from the dew of heaven, and from the fertility of the earth: as the elders who saw John, the disciple of the Lord, related, that they had heard from him how the Lord used to teach in regard to these times, and say: The days will come, in which vines shall grow, each having ten thousand branches, and in each branch ten thousand twigs, and in each true twig ten thousand shoots, and in each one of the shoots ten thousand clusters, and on every one of the clusters ten thousand grapes, and every grape when pressed will give five and twenty metretes of wine. And when any one of the saints shall lay hold of a cluster, another shall cry out, “I am a better cluster, take me; bless the Lord through me.” In like manner [the Lord declared] that a grain of wheat would produce ten thousand ears, and that every ear should have ten thousand grains, and every grain would yield ten pounds (quinque bilibres) of clear, pure, fine flour; and that all other fruit-bearing trees, and seeds and grass, would produce in similar proportions (secundum congruentiam iis consequentem); and that all animals feeding [only] on the productions of the earth, should [in those days] become peaceful and harmonious among each other, and be in perfect subjection to man. BKV
4/ And these things are borne witness to in writing by Papias, the hearer of John, and a companion of Polycarp, in his fourth book; for there were five books compiled (συντεταγμενα) by him. And he says in addition, “Now these things are credible to believers.” And he says that, “when the traitor Judas did not give credit to them, and put the question, ‘How then can things about to bring forth so abundantly be wrought by the Lord?’ the Lord declared, ‘They who shall come to these [times] shall see.’” AH 5, XXXIII:4, p562 BKV
AH 5, XXXIV:2 (John reference)
Again John also says the very same in the Apocalypse: “Blessed and holy is he who has part in the first resurrection.” [[Revelation 20:6]] AH 5, XXXIV:2, p564 BKV
AH 5, XXXIV:3 (disciples of the Lord)
Now, in the preceding book I have shown that, all the disciples of the Lord are Levites and priests, they who used in the temple to profane the Sabbath, but are blameless.” AH 5, XXXIV:3, p564 BKV
AH 5, XXXV:2 (John reference)
And in the Apocalypse John saw this new [Jerusalem] descending upon the new earth. [[Revelation 21:2]] … When these things, therefore, pass away above the earth, John, the Lord’s disciple, says that the new Jerusalem above shall [then] descend, as a bride adorned for her husband; [[Revelation 21:2]] and that this is the tabernacle of God, in which God will dwell with men. AH 5, XXXV:2 p566 BKV
AH 5, XXXVI:1-3 (John, apostle reference)
But when this [present] fashion [of things] passes away, and man has been renewed, and flourishes in an incorruptible state, so as to preclude the possibility of becoming old, [then] there shall be the new heaven and the new earth, in which the new man shall remain [continually], always holding fresh converse with God. And since {or, that) these things shall ever continue without end, Isaiah declares, “For as the new heavens and the new earth which I do make, continue in my sight, saith the Lord, so shall your seed and your name remain.” And as the presbyters say, Then those who are deemed worthy of an abode in heaven shall go there, others shall enjoy the delights of paradise, and others shall possess the splendour of the city; for everywhere the Saviour shall be seen according as they who see Him shall be worthy. BKV
2/ [They say, moreover], that there is this distinction between the habitation of those who produce an hundred-fold, and that of those who produce sixty-fold, and that of those who produce thirty-fold: for the first will be taken up into the heavens, the second will dwell in paradise, the last will inhabit the city; and that it was on this account the Lord declared, “In My Father’s house are many mansions.” [[John 14:2]] For all things belong to God, who supplies all with a suitable dwelling-place; even as His Word says, that a share is allotted to all by the Father, according as each person is or shall be worthy. And this is the couch on which the guests shall recline, having been invited to the wedding. The presbyters, the disciples of the apostles, affirm that this is the gradation and arrangement of those who are saved, and that they advance through steps of this nature; also that they ascend through the Spirit to the Son, and through the Son to the Father, and that in due time the son will yield up His work to the Father, even as it is said by the apostle, “For He must reign till He hath put all enemies under His feet. The last enemy that shall be destroyed is death.” [[1 Cor 15:25-26]] For in the times of the kingdom, the righteous man who is upon the earth shall then forget to die. “But when He saith, All things shall be subdued unto Him, it is manifest that He is excepted who did put all things under Him. And when all things shall be subdued unto Him, then shall the Son also Himself be subject unto Him who put all things under Him, that God may be all in all.” [[1 Cor 15:27-28]] BKV (SA, Paul)
3/ John, therefore, did distinctly foresee the first “resurrection of the just,” [[Luke 14:14]] and the inheritance in the kingdom of the earth; and what the prophets have prophesied concerning it harmonize [with his vision]. For the Lord also taught these things, when He promised that He would have the mixed cup new with His disciples in the kingdom. The apostle, too, has confessed that the creation shall be free from the bondage of corruption, [so as to pass] into the liberty of the sons of God. [[Romans 8:21]] AH 5, XXXVI:2-3 p567 BKV (Paul)
Use of “John”, “apostle” in “Demonstration of the Apostolic Preaching”
See Demonstration of the Apostolic Preaching (DAP). For history and text see Irenaeus of Lyons (1952). From Smith:
The Proof was for long supposed to have been irretrievably lost, but in 1904 an Armenian version of it was found, in a manuscript belonging to the church of Our Lady at Erevan (now the capital of Soviet Armenia) by the Most Rev. Archimandrite (of Etschmiadzin) Karapet Ter Mekerttschian, … (Smith p4)
… our only sources for the text of the Proof are this manuscript and a few Armenian fragments. (Smith p7)
DAP (from Smith):
… Now, this is what faith does for us, as the elders, the disciples of the apostles, have handed down to us. … DAP 3, p49 (SA)
… Hence too His apostle Paul well says … DAP 5, p50 (Paul)
… as the blessed apostle says: knowing not, that the benignity of God leadeth thee to penance …” … [[Romans 2:4]] DAP 8, p52 (Paul)
… Taught by Him, and witnesses of all His good works and of His teaching and of His passion and death and resurrection and ascent into heaven after the bodily resurrection, were the apostles, who after
the power of the Holy Spirit were sent by Him into the whole world and carried out the calling of the Gentiles, … DAP 41, p73 (?12, SA)
… To this purpose also His disciple John, telling us who God’s Son is, who was with the Father before the world was made, says also, that it was through Him that all creatures were made, as follows: In the beginning was the Word, and the Word was with God, and the Word was God; the same was in the beginning with God; all things were made by Him, and without Him was made nothing;… [[John 1:1-3]] DAP 43, p75-76
… He has both caused to gush forth in abundance in the desert a stream of water from a rock — and the rock is Himself — and given twelve springs — that is, the teaching of the twelve apostles … DAP 46, p77-78 (12)
… And “oil of anointing” is the Spirit, through whom He is the Anointed, and “His fellows” are the prophets and the just and the apostles, and all who receive fellowship of His kingdom, that is, His disciples. … DAP 47, p78 (12 / SA)
… and true the tradition of the preaching, that is, the witness of the apostles, who, sent by the Lord, preached to the whole world that the Son of God was come unto sufferings … DAP 86, p100 (SA)
… And therefore the apostle Paul says: Love is the fulfilment of the law, … [[Romans 13:10]] DAP 87, p101 (Paul)
94/ So through the new calling a change of heart comes about in the Gentiles, through the Word of God, when He became incarnate and tabernacled with men, as also His disciple John says: and His Word was made flesh and dwelt among us. … [[John 1:14]] DAP 94, p104
98/ This, beloved, is the preaching of the truth, this is the manner of our salvation, and this is the way of life, announced by the prophets and ratified by Christ and handed over by the apostles and handed down by the Church in the whole world to her children. … DAP 98, p108 (SA)
… And others again despise the coming of the Son of God and the dispensation of His incarnation, which the apostles have transmitted to us, and which the prophets foretold would be the summing-up of humanity, as we have shown you in brief. … DAP 99, p108 (SA)
Use of “John” and apostle” in fragments attributed to Irenaeus
These are from various sources, noted below for each.
With regard to the genuineness of the fragments, Massuet the Benedictine Editor who had bestowed much pains in verifying those which his predecessors had collected from Catenae, &c., points out (i. 338) that they were of two kinds, those given by Eusebius and other ancient writers being undoubtedly genuine, those given by later writers or again by Catenae (whose compilers constantly condensed very considerably, whose transcribers sometimes put by mistake the wrong name) are of more doubtful authority. Massuet sums up, We give here all the fragments which have been collected by Feuardent, Halloix, Sirmond, Combefis, Grabe and others and those which ourselves have collected, yet not attaching to them more credit than they deserve.
The first 13 fragments and the 6 Syriac ones and again those marked 35 to 38 will probably be genuine, the 14th and again the last fragment from the Armenian almost certainly spurious; of the Catenae-fragments some rest on the authority of several Mss., (and for these the probability of the wrong name having been appended is very considerably diminished,) some again at present on that of one Ms. only, while fragment xxxix attributed to S. Irenœus by the Vatican Ms. 331 and one of the Mss. used by the editor of the Leipzig Catena, is by bis other Ms. attributed to Diodorus, and probably also (since Muenter was the first to publish it) the 3 Paris Catenae consulted by Massuet attribute this fragment to Diodorus or some other writer.
(The 6 Syriac fragments have labels “a” through “f”. There follows fragment “g”, the last listed fragment, which must be the “the last fragment from the Armenian” referred to above.)
Letter to Florinus (John, apostle)
From Roberts (Roberts and Donaldson (1885a)), above, p568 (Roberts, Keble fragment #II, likely genuine). Notes from Roberts):
This interesting extract we also owe to Eusebius, who (ut sup.) took it from the work De Ogdoade, written after this former friend of Irenaeus had lapsed to Valentinianism. Florinus had previously held that God was the author of evil, which sentiment Irenaeus opposed in a treatise, now lost, called περι μοναρχιας.
Text:
These opinions, Florinus, that I may speak in mild terms, are not of sound doctrine ; these opinions are not consonant to the Church, and involve their votaries in the utmost impiety; these opinions, even the heretics beyond the Church’s pale have never ventured to broach ; these opinions, those presbyters who preceded us, and who were conversant with the apostles, did not hand down to thee. For, while I was yet a boy, I saw thee in Lower Asia with Poly- carp, distinguishing thyself in the royal court, and endeavouring to gain his approbation. For I have a more vivid recollection of what occurred at that time than of recent events (inasmuch as the experiences of childhood, keeping pace with the growth of the soul, become incorporated with it) ; so that I can even describe the place where the blessed Polycarp used to sit and discourse — his going out, too, and his coming in — his general mode of life and personal appearance, together with the discourses which he delivered to the people; also how he would speak of his familiar intercourse with John, and with the rest of those who had seen the Lord; and how he would call their words to remembrance. Whatsoever things he had heard from them respecting the Lord, both with regard to His miracles and His teaching, Polycarp having thus received [information] from the eye-witnesses of the Word of life, would recount them all in harmony with the Scriptures. These things, through God’s mercy which was upon, me, I then listened to attentively, and treasured them up not on paper, but in my heart; and I am continually, by God’s grace, revolving these things accurately in my mind. And I can bear witness before God, that if that blessed and apostolical presbyter had heard any such thing, he would have cried out, and stopped his ears exclaiming as he was wont to do: “O good God, for what times hast Thou reserved me, that I should endure these things?” And he would have fled from the very spot where, sitting; or standing, he had heard such words. This fact, too, can be made clear, from his Epistles — which he despatched, whether to the neighbouring Churches to confirm them, or to certain of the brethren, admonishing and exhorting them.
Letter to Victor on observance of Easter
Roberts, p568-9 (Roberts, Keble fragment #III, likely genuine). Note from Roberts:
We are indebted again to Eusebius for this valuable fragment from the Epistle of Irenaeus to Victor Bishop of Rome (Hist. Eccl. , v. 24 ; copied also by Nicephorus, iv. 39) . It appears to have been a synodical epistle to the head of the- Roman Church, the historian saying that it was written by Irenaeus, “in the name of (ἐκ προσοπτου) those brethren over whom he ruled, throughout Gaul.
Text:
For the controversy is not merely as regards; the day, but also as regards the form itself of the fast. For some consider themselves bound to fast one day, others two days, others still more, while others [do so during] forty : the diurnal and the nocturnal hours they measure out together as their [fasting] day. And this variety among the observers [of the fasts] had not its origin in our time, but long before in that of our predecessors, some of whom probably, being” not very accurate in their observance of it, handed down to posterity the custom as it had, through simplicity or private fancy, been [introduced among them] . And yet nevertheless all these lived in peace one with another, and we also keep peace together. Thus, in fact, the difference [in observing] the fast establishes the harmony of [our common] faith. And the presbyters preceding Soter in the government of the Church which thou dost now rule — I mean, Anicetus and Pius, Hyginus and Telesphorus, and Sixtus — did neither themselves observe it [after that fashion], nor permit those with them to do so. Notwithstanding this, those who did not keep [the feast in this way] were peacefully disposed towards those who came to them from other dioceses in which it was [so] observed, although such observance was [felt] in more decided contrariety [as presented] to those who did not fall in with it ; and none were ever cast out [of the Church] for this matter. On the contrary, those presbyters who preceded thee, and who did not observe [this custom], sent the Eucharist to those of other dioceses who did observe it. And when the blessed Polycarp was sojourning in Rome in the time of Anicetus, although a slight controversy had arisen among them as to certain other points, they were at once well inclined towards each other [with regard to the matter in hand], not willing that any quarrel should arise between them upon this head. For neither could Anicetus persuade Polycarp to forego the observance [in his own way], inasmuch as these things had been always [so] observed by John the disciple of our Lord, and by other apostles with whom he had been conversant ; nor, on the other hand, could Polycarp succeed in persuading Anicetus to keep [the observance in his way], for he maintained that he was bound to adhere to the usage of the presbyters who preceded him. And in this state of affairs they held fellowship with each other ; and Anicetus conceded to Polycarp in the Church the celebration of the Eucharist, by way of showing him respect ; so that they parted in peace one from the other, maintaining peace with the whole Church, both those who did observe [this custom] and those who did not.
Fragment XXXI in Roberts
Roberts, p573 (Keble fragment #XXIX, “doubtful”):
For the Judge of the whole world is thus proclaimed, who, having been hidden in the heart of the earth in a tomb for three days, and having become a great tree, has stretched forth His branches to the ends of the earth. Sprouting out from Him, the twelve apostles, having become fair and fruitful boughs, were made a shelter for the nations as for the fowls of heaven, under which boughs, all having taken refuge, as birds flocking to a nest, have been made partakers of that wholesome and celestial food which is derived from them. p573
Roberts Fragment XXXVI
Roberts p574, Keble #XXXV, “probably” genuine:
… and “the word is nigh thee, in thy mouth and in thy heart,” [[Romans 10:8]] as the same apostle [[Paul]] declares, being easy of comprehension to those who are obedient.
Roberts fragment XXXVII
Roberts p574, Keble #XXXVI, “probably” genuine:
Those who have become acquainted with the secondary (i.e., under Christ) constitutions of the apostles, are aware that the Lord instituted a new oblation, in the new covenant, according to [the declaration of] Malachi the prophet.
Roberts fragment XXXVIII
Roberts p575, Keble #XXXVII, “probably” genuine:
The apostles ordained, that “we should not judge any one in respect to meat or drink, or in regard to a feast day, or the new moons, or the sabbaths.” [[Colossians 2:16]]
Roberts fragment XL
Roberts p575, Keble #XXXIX “doubtful”:
… For thus, according to the holy apostle, the sin of fornication is perpetrated against the body, as involving also sin against the temple of God. [[1 Corinthians 3:16-17]]
Roberts fragment LIV
Roberts p577, Keble Syriac fragment e, inside insertion from “not old” Armenian manuscript, unclear if genuine:
… He [[Jesus]] gathered the apostles together, and preached the kingdom of heaven …; He manifested Himself in the body, was suspended upon a beam of wood, and raised from the dead; shown to the apostles, and, having been carried up to heaven, sitteth on the right hand of the Father, …
References
Translation from the Modern Literal Version — Aug 2026↩︎
The Latin (Harvey 1857, 2:p81) has “Manifesta igitur et Apostolorum et 3discentium eorum ex verbis ipsorum de Deo facta est sententia.”, where footnote 3 is: “discentium, i.e. μαθηται as at [p 68], meaning S. Luke and S. Mark. So”(Mark and Luke)” are inferred by Harvey and Roberts.↩︎